Bf-109K-4 > P-51D, Tempest, La-7, et. al. at arena alt, where arena alt <<< 20k ft. Nobody flies high enough around here anyway.
I would hope all that demand realism out of the flight models intend to fly these realistic flight models in a realistic fashion. 22 one way typhoon missions to take the cv fleet is not the least bit realistic.
Max speed of fastest planes sea level wep on. Ла-7 — 610 kmh. TempestV — 609 kmh FW-190D9 — 602 kmh F4U-4 — 595 kmh 109K4(g10) — 595kmh P-51D — 588 kmh Spit XIV — 581 kmh La-5fn — 580 kmh F4U-1D — 572 kmh FW-190A8 — 568 kmh
indeed! odious red hordes could be stopped only by http://luft46.volga.ru/luft46.html for entire war luftwhinners could break out after any porked merge, so they just cannot imagine what means to stand and fight.
Interesting : http://www.spitfireperformance.com/mustang/mustangtest.html P-51D WEP at sea level is : 375 mph = 603.504 kph Also see: http://www.wwiiaircraftperformance.org/
I believe more to second report with 368 mph, because i can easily understand why P-51D is a bit slower than P-51B, but i don't see what could make it faster. But anyway 368mph~591kmh, 3 kmh more than i've got.
dew to spitfireperformance b-15-NA had V-1650-7 and was even slower than P-51b with V-1650-3 at sea level. Also there are 371mph for B-5-NA (V-1650-7 too). And overall there are disperce of about 15 mph for similar mustangs but from different reports. And 368mph is a bit more than middle of different results, so it looks quite ok for B and D to have very close or similar speeds near 590 kmh.
I'd like to see the B25H fixed. It can't climb at all, even after dropping bombs, and its 75mm has been neutered. And I saw in another post that the F4Us are being changed back to the 2.77 settings. Do the same for the P38 and FM2 and I'll marry your sister exec if she wants to come to the US.
P-38 of ien is ufo. favorite plane of ien's chief... i will pass to fas your message about 25h climb rate. as for 75mm, it's a server DM, not client FHL
Do you know that the P-38 in IEN's Warbirds 3 currently performs worse than the P-38 in FH? They're about equal in speed and climb, but FH's Lightning turns faaaar better at the low end of the speed regime (140 - 150 mph IAS).
devs made that because of english report/1942: the only way for lightning1 to escape from 190 is tight spiral climb.
Yes, I do know that there are some fast gold planes but you can't turn them at all.........which is a byproduct the sacrifices required to achieve those speeds. What I see are either thick wing planes going unbelievably fast or thin wing planes being able to turn with a spitfire. I understand some of this will be fixed so I am crossing my fingers for 1.68 since I fly whatever color has the low roster......or....the side who's planeset isn't full of planes I fly only very rarely because I feel them unfair to my opponent. That's why you rarely see me in a KI84, LA7, Tempest, Typhoon, F4U....etc but rather in the earliest version of the spitfire I can find or a yak7 or a KI44 or even a zero in late war.
Did u test it on WB2010? IMO at TH the f*ckin P-38 (all versions) is master über and it is exactly the same that came from iEN. I think it's much better the way P-38 FH is. Mb I'm wrong, I'm not a P-38 ace..
No idea about TH. Nobody ever goes there anyway, plus I could never get a ping better than 500 millisecs.