lol, did thug cock up with the nicks? i thought you are SteveS? exec, shouldnt you, as a moderator read everything and have no people in the ignore list? %) i hope in the best traditions of the un-accountable non-US world, banning RollandGarros will be a one-off action that will not be followed by rules for behaviour. thug, if you like accountability why are you playing a hacked stolen american (ouch!) game? PS: btw the new Mihalkov's film "12" is really cool!
the problem with this guy, unlike Fuck or Gandhi, is that he is not trying to joke. He is trying to act on you psychologically. To make your visit here suck, especially if you post something and he devalues it completely after that. why is he how quiet now? An idea to all the little experimentalists that are abusing this forum: why dont you try a positive-emotion approach too? create a nick that will flatter every posting which is taking itself too seriously.
mostly these are russian-speaking members where i ain't a moderator (only history, engineering, 228 shad and beta forums). as for members of international, there are folk who signal me about messages i don't see. still 16 men (vs 13) voted that "the poll is useless/incorrect and they actually deny voting". that is actual meaning of traditional poll item. it's remake of "12 angry men". haven't seen these, so cannot say whether mikhalkov's one is con-genial. but the film indeed is a good one. p.s.if scales tend for banning him, i will check who's alter ego it is and consider banning first ego too. but afair i checked identity of garros long ago and he was a unique member, not duplicating with any other member.
NO in your great magnificence you forgot to post a "NO, don't ban him" option in the poll this is not quite the same as "forgettable jocular, let's ignore him" if you think so, you're biased as far as I'm concerned the "woodpecker" option in this poll means "don't ban him and exec is a stupid fuck" somebody pls quote this, as I'm one of the lucky 32 on exec's ignore list the "stupid fuck" might direct you to why that and the pe-8 bullshit
No, that's 5 vs. 13. Cierzo + grobar + thug + (focker+jebac+ronin=ronin) + (joseh-+looseleaf+madman+phantom+rintincan+rondon+SteveS=looseleaf) vs. -al--- + -BISH- + airfax + (Borz+Cu-pal+Fucketeer+Kutya=Fucketeer) + bazura + demian + FranzAugust + Funtom + mumble + Snakeye + spuint + vasco + yankee .
Just out of curiosity, give a hint about multi-nick users? I know al is one them (spuint? nice try al...) but the rest?
these multiple always put in some intreague i am afraid your detective skills have let you down on some of these
thug = bot I created bot when my thug nick wouldn't work for about 6 months. Grobar my laptop always logs me in as bot and I'm to lazy to relog before posting but I only voted once, I figured it was the "right" thing to do.
If he is not banned now, there will be no stopping him and we can expect this place to go straight down the toilet.
"Are you thinking what I'm thinking, Pinky?" "Yes, but what if the goat doesn't want to wear the nylons?"
@looseleaf & ronin: Could you please stop using another forum members real name? It's a bit annoying...or at least not to use whole name? If you want some decency to be used in the forum, you could show an example by your own actions. And yes, by now we all know that you know fuckies real name.... /?
