http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q6EqcvUUPKo&feature=feedlik FAQ for tourists who are planning to watch World Cup matches in Brazil
Maybeit is? Polls opinions [POLLS FIND UTES MUST GO - NEW YORK TIMES NOVEMBER 11 1877], opinion polls and labelling and stigmata is something YANKEES cal THAT democracy. And they claim their way [what way???? Look at how Merika was taken]. Yankees have beat the shit out of the Spanish speaking people in The Americas. But the are stumped by a few who organise and stand up and resist, even just a little, you know? And Venzuela. And Cuba. And Panama. And Argentina. And Pereguay. And Utah. Ironic naming of a place. Utah..... Brazil is in the 'first world.' warts on all. It is yanks that invented the fuckin term 'third world. Don't Brazilians speak Portuguese? Has the term third world migrated so that it is now in use in Portuguese? WHY? That is not a Portuguese term. Is it a Brazilian attitude? Do people who live there consider the land or the many millions of people, none of them who starve during famine. And none who are invaded by NATO or USA YET. third world? Yankees label. The broadcast evil Newspeak and evil Newthink and even Brazilians like you fall for it? There are no stealth Bombers in the Brazilian Air Force. Why, I wonder, is it because they are in 'the third world?' If so, I hope the stay in the 'third world.' There is already enough suffering caused on humanity by elite punks like Yanks and England [and indeed, Canada, no nukes, but we still label others third world. We speak Yankee. It is a type of English. We used to speak English. Brazil Portuguese being re-write by Yanks... Third world, PFT. HAIL BRAZIL! I wish you well, all of you. Struggle and thrive.
We could write a bot to monitor this forum and insert your (and compatriot M's) anti-American observations. Really that would be a good project for a comp sci class
Hi Uncles! Nice to know you watched the trailer. I can tell. PS anti Americans are the ones who carried out 9/11. Not me or biles.
His close proximity to Washington state could warrant for investigation. He's too close to the USA for comfort maybe. %)
I KNEW it! Always wondered about hezzey, jacobe, brainy, boa, mumble, antred, exec, ghandi, archer, frog, decent, higgns, al, ho hun, bullet........flyzzz.......ummm.....oops...maybe.....errrr
Lunatics don't warrant investigation, and you certainly don't understand my humor I recognize that I hold an unpopular position: US did not attack itself Logic, reason and reality will ultimately prevail. It may take some time for the "noise" to clear, but let's hope that an objective shake-out of history will prevail. Youtube is not my source of truth (but it's entertaining). Things are a bit too crazy these days for reason. I'm not looking for a fight, man.
I am not anti-American. I am Anti-Yank. Those are different attitudes altogether. Anti-Yank. There have only been a few invasions of Canada. Guess who it was that did so? USA. They wanted the REST OF AMERICA. They didn't get it. They did get Mexico and all of the rest of the Panama isthmus to kneel. But they didn't to us up here, because back then, the USA had fear of invading Canada, so they never did commit themselves, like they did in Mexico and Panama and Cuba, yes poor Cuba. Stay the fuck away from me and my family and my property yank. Are you one? You know, one of those people who shouts those magic and hardly understood words, Freedom Liberty. Justice. ? USA a People of SLOGANS. THE UTES MUST GO! The IRANIANS MUST GO! Yeah, sounds familiar? Who is next? Venezuela? Libya? Colombia? Yukon Territory?
I'm not looking for a fight either, I just know that facts prove the obvious, and history repeats itself. The US attacked itself, just to blame the Muslims, just like Nero did to blame the Christians. Just like Hitler did to blame the Jewish people.
I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it. “Laws that forbid the carrying of arms...disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes... Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man.” (Quoting Cesare Beccaria) The beauty of the Second Amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it. The policy of the American government is to leave their citizens free, neither restraining nor aiding them in their pursuits. No man has a natural right to commit aggression on the equal rights of another, and this is all from which the laws ought to restrain him. To take from one because it is thought that his own industry and that of his father’s has acquired too much, in order to spare to others, who, or whose fathers, have not exercised equal industry and skill, is to violate arbitrarily the first principle of association—the guarantee to every one of a free exercise of his industry and the fruits acquired by it. -Thomas Jefferson