Zero and RPS

Discussion in 'Warbirds General Discussion' started by Sturmbock, Feb 11, 2006.

  1. Sturmbock

    Sturmbock Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2002
    Messages:
    51
    Location:
    Finland
    There is too big hole in timeline between A6M2b and A6M3: two years and two months.

    My suggestion for new rps:

    A6M2b mod. 21B jan 1940
    A6M3 mod. 32 jan 1941
    A6M5 mod. 52 jan 1942
    A6M5 mod. 52B jan 1943

    Why so? Zero is not very useful in late war (deathtrap against energy fighters), so let it fly earlier :fly2:
     
  2. daniil

    daniil Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2005
    Messages:
    161
    Location:
    Киев
    Really. In late war no zero needed. Better close zero in 1943 and add N1KJ
     
  3. -exec-

    -exec- FH Consultant

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2000
    Messages:
    24,690
    Location:
    xUSSR
    afair historical appearance is:
    a6m2b'21b - 1941, first half of the year.
    a6m3b'32 - 1942, second half of the year. nicknamed hamp (later hap).
    hap was not in midway battle that took place in 1942-06.
    anyways hap's somehow earlier in the game - 1942-03.
    eh?

    shiden flown in 1944. first kokutai equipped was 341 in about august?

    p.s. a6m5'52 is removed in 1.66 and she's rps date is taken by more early a6m5b'52b.
    free slot is passed to pe-2'179 (1943). old pe-2 is defined as pe-2'13 (1941).
     
  4. Sturmbock

    Sturmbock Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2002
    Messages:
    51
    Location:
    Finland
    I know that. There is no realism in RPS anyway, example A6M2b in jan 1940 (too early) and Fw190-A3 april 1942 (too late).
     
  5. Broz

    Broz Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2002
    Messages:
    8,830
    Location:
    Salamanca (España)
    exec, pls, don't keep it on, or they'll start asking for 262....




    j/k ;)
     
  6. -exec-

    -exec- FH Consultant

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2000
    Messages:
    24,690
    Location:
    xUSSR
    i cannot decide it personally, since it is a fighter. i ain't one of those.
    i'm an attacker.

    i will consult with wise fighters.
     
  7. daniil

    daniil Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2005
    Messages:
    161
    Location:
    Киев
    BTW: Exec, what about hangars and mast/hat targets ?
     
  8. -exec-

    -exec- FH Consultant

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2000
    Messages:
    24,690
    Location:
    xUSSR
    what?
     
  9. daniil

    daniil Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2005
    Messages:
    161
    Location:
    Киев
    Can you add in FH next features: if target destroyed then
    -hangar -- all rps on this field -0.5-1 year
    -hut and mast -- dar on this field have 1/2 of its normal quality.

    In topic - why 1st FW appears 1993 and 2 next of it in 1992? is it real?
     
  10. hardy

    hardy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2002
    Messages:
    16,608
    Location:
    Saratov, Russia
    м-да.
    ты бы на русском сформулировал, мил человек.
    Экзек, он, знаешь, иногда и по-русски понимает, не токо по английски... :)
     
  11. -exec-

    -exec- FH Consultant

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2000
    Messages:
    24,690
    Location:
    xUSSR
    то, что он сформулровал:
    1.оффтоп для этого треда
    2.программирование Айке
    короче, я тут не к месту.
     
  12. daniil

    daniil Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2005
    Messages:
    161
    Location:
    Киев
    Энту тему фя уже заводил, ее успешно обговорили, сказали *мы попробуем* и забыли... и забили. Она еще кажись висит. Площадные цели называется.