Loose Change 3 - Final Cut

Wow. I am reasonably convinced that WTC building 7 was destroyed on purpose. It wasn't hit by an airplane at all. It was taken down. A building over 40 stories tall gets taken down by carefully placed explosives. It just so happens that WTC7 is in close proximity to the other two main buildings that were hit by airplanes. Is this normal? Am I to believe that destroying a perfectly good scyscraper in downtown New York City is normal part of everyday life? Call me a conspiracy nut, but there is something wrong with September 11th Events. The explosives must have been placed several days in advance of September 11th, a demolition team who knew what they were doing would take approximately 3 days to perform this work prior to the controlled demolition of this building. At any rate, It is very difficult for me to believe that a demolition team was sent into WTC building 7 on the morning of September 11th to destroy a perfectly good building.

To me, this means that September 11th events were orchestrated.

 

i hear ya, brutha

heres waht the guv'mint dusnt want u to see:

 

lol so i'm not alone... I think the same, mcloud.

 

Conspiracy nut. (Well, you asked for it!)

 

I think there is noone who disagree with mcloud.

 

9/11 is the Pearl Harbour attack of XXI century.

 

i agree

 

Umm .....

 

mcloud is too late

i alredy threw this idee out there months ago

lookie

 

Go ahead, say it...

Oh btw here's an audio interview of a former German defense minister talking about Sept. 11th. The guy who is giving the Interview, Alex Jones, is a bit of a nut, and there are a lot of junky commercials, he tries to box Von Beulow into making accusations, but overall the interview is very interesting.

Now I have 2 germans that agree with me, this guy and Franz, HAHAHAHA FU redant!!

http://www.prisonplanet.tv/audio/200406vonbuelow.htm

 

Actually it was structual damage incurred from the collapse of the twin towers. There were other buildings around which were damaged to one degree or another; some rather heavily --- (saw it).

One would think that two very large buildings, collapsing, with other smaller buildings built too closely, would inflict collateral damage.

 

LOL. Did you see WTC building 7 collapse? I did --- (saw it). It was over 40 stories tall. There was no structural damage to it at all. It was deliberately destroyed. WTC building 7 went from being a 40+ story high building to rubble, in a perfectly controlled collapse in approximately 6 seconds. Sorry, but that's reality, never mind this "think" bullshit.

You "Think" a lot. But you don't know much.

Denial is a very primitive, but powerful defense mechanism. If people don't want to see the truth, THEY WON'T.

 

u ar wrong

what's that i hear?

defiant mumbling?

its because u ar afraid

i speak the truth

if u ar afraid of me its only because u are afraid of the truth

so there

U ar in denial

u will deny this

 

lol, Trust me, I'm not in denial about Sept 11th. Anyone who thinks that WTC building 7 went down because of "structural damage" caused by other buildings near it doesn't know jack shit about WTC7. WTC 7 went down because it was taken down by explosives. Sorry, but that's what happened. If I was afraid of something, I wouldn't want to face the facts about it, that's your department, not mine. Face the facts, WTC 7 was destroyed on purpose. a 40+ story building doesnt fall to the ground in 6 seconds because a pelican landed on the rooftop. It's called demolition.

GANDHI, wtf are you talking about?? I'm the one who started this post! I'm the one who thinks that sept 11th was orchestrated, look at your last post and your first post, are you smoking THE BEST WEED IN THE WORLD?????????????

 

new sig hier

 

look at first post, then look at this!

 

I don't claim to know it all, but I'm not readily converted to conspiracy theories made up by loonies who claim that THEY know it all.
Just to make a counterpoint, here's an excerpt of a Wikipedia article on WTC 7.

and ...

So until you folks can provide compelling evidence that WTC 7 was indeed brought down by a controlled demolition, which at this point doesn't seem very likely, I'd rather go with what the experts say.

 

Yep. Me too...

 

mcloud when will u acknowledg the pearl harbour conspiracy?

pearl harbour conspiracy

i dont think u hav any respect for the victims of pearl harbour if u dont want to help me spred the truth

 

Smoke them joints boys, smoke them joints.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denial

Hey mom, is that a bonfire? No jimmy, that's a 47 story building on "fire" that's going to drop to the ground 1 second slower than if you would have thrown a brick off the roof, now let's go smoke a joint.


Media blackout RE: WTC7 I wonder why, LOL
Experts discuss how WTC7 collapsed from "fire" LOL

More denial (on my part) NOT
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysis/wtc7/demolition.html
http://www.911research.com/wtc/evidence/videos/docs/discussion_in_firehouse.mpg
http://www.911research.com/wtc/evidence/videos/docs/collapsed_to_dust.mpg