a main teamspeak server will be needed?

Discussion in 'Warbirds International' started by -mart-, Feb 27, 2007.

  1. -mart-

    -mart- Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2000
    Messages:
    16,508
    Location:
    Russia
    2 channel, red and gold?
     
  2. vasco

    vasco Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2005
    Messages:
    4,375
    imo it would be a mess to have on the same TS channel 20 or more people who are flying different missions. but mb it can be used by people who are organising raids
    the AH voice com is cool, u can talk only to those who are near u
     
  3. Eddiev

    Eddiev Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2003
    Messages:
    661
    Location:
    São Paulo - Brazil
    I agree. I agree. I agree. ;)
     
    1 person likes this.
  4. tigrou

    tigrou Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2004
    Messages:
    1,258
    Location:
    toulouse
    i agree :) may be with possible make sub channels for squad, wings or raids.
     
    1 person likes this.
  5. RedBull

    RedBull Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2001
    Messages:
    552
    Location:
    Czech Republic
    IMO needless idea:
    1. very few players know right Radio Operates and good RO checklist. Without knowledge and keeping of it - all voice comm will be only a huge mess
    2. increase spying possibilities
    3. many squads already use their own TS for communication
    FH foundation as it is now is about unorganized individual flying and furballs. This type of gameplay doesnt need extra TS. Would be needed when more "mission and coop oriented". But it isnt now and probably never will be.
     
    1 person likes this.
  6. tigrou

    tigrou Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2004
    Messages:
    1,258
    Location:
    toulouse
    instant player need fun only, and quick switch to TS if want, other squad who have allready ts are not concerned imo
    it s no irl here redbull ;)
     
  7. FranzAugust

    FranzAugust Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2002
    Messages:
    1,445
    Location:
    Germany
    pro FH TS
     
    1 person likes this.
  8. reuben

    reuben Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2004
    Messages:
    2,096
    Location:
    SWEDEN
    TS suxx hippobutt when there are too many people in.

    If 20 people was in the same channel, it would be very hard to know who the heck talks , and about what.

    This is from experience with RW and TS in this game.

    We have been maybe 5 or at max, and if you dont recognize the voices dead-on... you will rather be confised than helped.

    So, for an 'open for all red/gold' TS CHANNEL, I do not think it's good.

    sorry ...
     
    1 person likes this.
  9. rudeboy

    rudeboy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2006
    Messages:
    1,786
    Location:
    Tower of power.
    The guys I play with I feel I know. We don't just talk tactical talk. When things aren't ahppenning in game, we talk about wives, kids, our dogs.
    I don't know if I would welcome having twenty more voices talking on that.
    It wouldn't feel like 'family.'

    Yes, TS is good. TS is good for gaming C3. It is good for talking to friends.
    It COUOLD be good for larger environments where people do not know each other, I am not sure.
    I fear a babble.
    Can't have a babble. It would do more harm than good unless we all agreed to learn radio protocol

    1)Say first, who talking to.
    2)Say then who you are.
    3) Say what you have to say.
    4) Say something like, "Over" to indicate you have finished saying it.

    This works fine in a disciplined frame of mind. But here, many people are not serious. Many people play for fun and are totally unbridled, carefree. Talking about the weather and our dogs, our wives, our kids is cool when there are four people on the channel. But when there are twenty, maybe it would degrade to a cackle?
     
  10. Eddiev

    Eddiev Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2003
    Messages:
    661
    Location:
    São Paulo - Brazil
    Are you Married, Rudeboy? :D
     
  11. rehn

    rehn Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2003
    Messages:
    104
    Maybe I can set up a server. I have a system running 24/7.
    But I don't want to spend time for admin.
    I would like to something like this. A multiple server using one
    port / server.
    50 ports in the range 40000-40050 for red players. 51 channels.
    50 ports in the range 50000-50050 for gold players. 51 channels.
    Anonymous log in, i.e. no registration necessary.
    ( How do I fix that btw? ?)
    That will enable spying but that is something we have to live with.
    Why so may channels:
    Channel 0 for general talk.
    The other channels might be used freely, my intention is
    that they should be connected to fields. So all players at, lets say, field f17 are
    using channel 40017(red) 50017(gold) etc.

    Any comments??
     
    1 person likes this.
  12. spuint

    spuint Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2003
    Messages:
    4,736
    well, ts for wbfh is cool idea
    but cant be 2 channels, 1 each side..
    better allow creating channels with passwords and let ppl organize themselves
    if there will be raid, one would create channel on password and invite trusted ppl
    same goes for squads who would use it mb for their own purposes

    it could help teamplay and coop on arena
    but only in this form, in any other it would be a mess, even with real radio formula
     
  13. looseleaf

    looseleaf Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2006
    Messages:
    5,028

    Firstly if the admins that run the servers should run the radio I believe there will be large gaps in service and even more terrible ping rates causing more confusion and frustration.

    Perhaps private radios can be assigned to all the squads just like the text messaging only that squad chnls have passwords or are allowed only to members so that there is no radio spying.
    A system that prevents the two computer user from logging onto red and gold nicks at the same time to further spy on radios would be a good idea.

    Just one radio for each color would be a disaster IMHO.
     
  14. tigrou

    tigrou Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2004
    Messages:
    1,258
    Location:
    toulouse
    it is the minimum and everybody is free to enter or not channel. i'm in, cause need a fixed ts server to use when some friends try wbfh for ex.
     
  15. FranzAugust

    FranzAugust Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2002
    Messages:
    1,445
    Location:
    Germany
    sry tigrou, it will be non francais serveur ;p
     
  16. Red Ant

    Red Ant Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2002
    Messages:
    4,946
    Location:
    Germany

    We'd just have to introduce proper radio discipline. Something like:

    "Red Crown (red air control), this is rubbee (red cannon fodder :D) .... my posit is 7 5 1, request vector to nearest con."

    to which Red Crown would reply:

    "rubbee, this is Red Crown, nearest con is bearing 180, 5 miles"

    :D :D j/k ohh, but it would be fun to talk like the big boys :D
     
  17. spuint

    spuint Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2003
    Messages:
    4,736
    hey fucker that was my kill
    fuck you


    big boys that is
     
  18. Red Ant

    Red Ant Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2002
    Messages:
    4,946
    Location:
    Germany
    That would be "airgem, this is kaazan, FU!! ... over and out" (sorry kaz :p)
     
  19. -al---

    -al--- Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2005
    Messages:
    6,848
    Location:
    Poznań
    it may easily be the other way around too!
     
  20. Red Ant

    Red Ant Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2002
    Messages:
    4,946
    Location:
    Germany
    "tuo dna revo ... !!UF ,nazaak si siht ,megria" ??

    Nahh, that doesn't seem right. :nono: