Errors of FHL1.68open-beta

Discussion in 'Warbirds International' started by -exec-, Aug 30, 2010.

Page 13 of 17
  1. hezey

    hezey Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2010
    Messages:
    2,319
    Location:
    British Columbia, Canada
    Cannon armed snoopy!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    P63!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
     
    hezey, Mar 13, 2011
    #241
  2. -exec-

    -exec- FH Consultant

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2000
    Messages:
    24,690
    Location:
    xUSSR
    and katyusha was available since 1941. that buys v-1 for reds.

    added to 2-do.list
     
    -exec-, Mar 13, 2011
    #242
  3. -exec-

    -exec- FH Consultant

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2000
    Messages:
    24,690
    Location:
    xUSSR
    never seen any combat reports.
    but will discuss it with developers.

    interesting.
    so you trade 109t for b-25b?
    and what b-25b will balance?

    according to my data - "lesser"

    other annoying suggestions:

    what is unbalanced now? what needs to be fixed?

    unreal.

    where are terrain tests, pal?
    where are terrain tests you promised to accomplish, looseleaf?
     
    -exec-, Mar 13, 2011
    #243
  4. joseh-

    joseh- Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2008
    Messages:
    250
    Even without combat reports of the P-63, I still would love to fly that thing. It's one of the sexiest planes of the WWII, a boosted P-39 :deal: .

    I'd rather fly P-63 than Meteor III...

    And I would trade that useless Bf-109T-1 slot by a bunch of Brewster Buffalos, MS.406 (Mörkö-Moranes), IAR80 or even Macchi C.200.

    Except for the P-63, I really think that we don't need more late-war planes or even buffs to balance or counter-balance anything. IMO new early war planes are more suitable.
     
    joseh-, Mar 13, 2011
    #244
  5. mixer

    mixer Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 21, 2002
    Messages:
    4,509
    BTW Ju52 with 18/28 paras has bug with auto-trim on level.
    Sorry, if it was already noted before (I'm almost sure it was).
     
    mixer, Mar 14, 2011
    #245
  6. Rainer

    Rainer Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2006
    Messages:
    328
    Location:
    Chicago, IL
    Me 163 Komet

    /thread
     
    Rainer, Mar 15, 2011
    #246
  7. -exec-

    -exec- FH Consultant

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2000
    Messages:
    24,690
    Location:
    xUSSR
    you cannot </terminate> thread
     
    -exec-, Mar 15, 2011
    #247
  8. joseh-

    joseh- Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2008
    Messages:
    250
    Hey exec-, what are the chances of 1.682 (1.69) release a new plane?
    Or at least to remove the useless ones?

    Can you sum up all the items u added to 2-do list and put down here? :zachot:
     
    joseh-, Mar 15, 2011
    #248
  9. -ALW-

    -ALW- Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2001
    Messages:
    2,096
    Location:
    Minot, North Dakota, USA
    I'm hoping for the P-38G since the F will be changed in performance. ;)
     
    -ALW-, Mar 16, 2011
    #249
  10. -exec-

    -exec- FH Consultant

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2000
    Messages:
    24,690
    Location:
    xUSSR
    -exec-, Mar 16, 2011
    #250
  11. Rainer

    Rainer Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2006
    Messages:
    328
    Location:
    Chicago, IL
    It was a crude attempt to put an end to everyone's self interest by adding an interest of my own that seemingly would trump the others. But while we're on the topic, why not Komet?
     
    Rainer, Mar 16, 2011
    #251
  12. Jacobe

    Jacobe Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2002
    Messages:
    3,340
    Location:
    Suomi,Finland
    Put North America WbNA1.trn to terrain cycle -exec-. :) Or why not? would be nice new addition for FH imho..
     
    Jacobe, Mar 16, 2011
    #252
  13. hezey

    hezey Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2010
    Messages:
    2,319
    Location:
    British Columbia, Canada
    Placing a pebble in a shoe makes the shoe interesting.
    Placing one into the other shoe makes the pair of shoes balanced.
    tossing a whole shit-load of pebbles into the shoes and having arguments about which configuration is better and which is worse
    really
    begs the question:

    Why not remove ALL the pebbles and leave the shoes as they were? Put new souls on them, new laces, maybe get some polish....

    As for myself I am growing weary [and wary] of NEW IMPROVED[!!].

    ISN'T IT POSSIBLE TO GO BACK IN TIME AND SUBJECT THE POOR DINKS WHO ARE THE PLAYERS [THE USERS] OF THIS GAME TO A PREDICTABLE, HUMAN FRIENDLY TEMPO AND RULE-SET?

    Why the fuck would anyone want to keep on fucking around with a classic?
    NEVER MIND, i KNOW WHY.

    Me163.
    Fuck off.


    I SAY, FLIGHTGEAR!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    HACK THAT CLIENT, HACK A SERVER SIDE PACKAGE.
    WOULD IT BE THAT DIFFICULT?
    I don't know.
    Wouldn't have to reverse engineer anything.
    Wouldn't have to worry about debating whether the thing is stolen or not.
    And it would not go obsolete because a fact yank decided my PC needs to be thrown into the garbage heap and replaced with the latest bullshit MS is forcing on my [stupid, zombie, hypnotized] neighbours and friends.
     
    Last edited: Mar 16, 2011
    hezey, Mar 16, 2011
    #253
  14. Red Ant

    Red Ant Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2002
    Messages:
    4,946
    Location:
    Germany

    Seriously? This game needs more jet / rocket planes?
     
    Red Ant, Mar 16, 2011
    #254
  15. looseleaf

    looseleaf Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2006
    Messages:
    5,028
    Sure! As long as they leave a vapor trail !
     
    looseleaf, Mar 16, 2011
    #255
  16. looseleaf

    looseleaf Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2006
    Messages:
    5,028
    Ha ha ha.... good point.


    Let's just give everyone here a "one day uber plane pass".

    That one day a month they get their favorite plane with UFO qualities and they are unbeatable for that one day.

    :D
     
    looseleaf, Mar 16, 2011
    #256
  17. -exec-

    -exec- FH Consultant

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2000
    Messages:
    24,690
    Location:
    xUSSR
    -exec-, Mar 17, 2011
    #257
  18. Rainer

    Rainer Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2006
    Messages:
    328
    Location:
    Chicago, IL
    Flightgear is an awesome idea. But, it being open, how would one control the plane set? Meaning, people could tweak/hack their individual planes to gain an advantage.

    Oh, and, Me163. Please.
     
    Rainer, Mar 18, 2011
    #258
  19. -exec-

    -exec- FH Consultant

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2000
    Messages:
    24,690
    Location:
    xUSSR
    komet will be right after bi

    and... GNU GPL will force us to keep client software open. and may be even server. license is not appropriate to cheater rich environment ;)
     
    Last edited: Mar 18, 2011
    -exec-, Mar 18, 2011
    #259
  20. mumble

    mumble Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2007
    Messages:
    1,315
    Location:
    in a bar
    Only 9 of whatever that bi is were made. Just tell us there will be no komet. :rolleyes:

    Exactly how useful do you think the Komet will be? It's basically a manned SAM with a handful of 30mm rounds. How to defeat the Komet? Have more than one buff pilot. Waste of plane slot IMO.
     
    mumble, Mar 18, 2011
    #260
Page 13 of 17