uhm, i have one request any chance to turn attach on on TA? i understand the reason why it was disabled on MA, but how does it harm anyone on TA? i hope that attach will be enabled again, when some kind of authentication will allow to attach only trustable ppl, but on TA theres no need for disabling it?
Ju 88 A for small field and G4M for CV were RPS bugs. Pe-2 is a heavy fighter "100" by design. weight ca8000kg, 600kg bombs. Mosquito is light bomber and heavy fighter. weight ca9800kg, 908kg bombs Ju 88 a medium bomber and not a fighter, except night crap. weight ca11000kg, 2500-3000kg bombs. medium bombers for medium fields Il-2 is in class of Stuka - battlefield airplane. Bf 110, Me 410, Fw 190 F, all 1000kg bombs negative for acrada.
good proposal. we will looks what we can do (codes for both servers are identical and we would not like to fork it into two parallel projects)...
how do i test the turn ratio? what alt and speed? i know i must turn 360º in a diference of less 50 meters, but what alt and speed? i dont think that all our planes, in the turn ratio were tested in all alts and speeds, dont they?
altitude=1000m wep=on flaps=(according to operational manual) .startlog myturn begin as tight turns as possible make at least 10 turns, of which at least 3 must be with constant speed and altitude .stoplog send log to us left-right - you decide. usually the better of two is taken into account.
I ve done test of climb rate and speed with and without wep of the P47c at 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 km alt, but those test are made at altitud of KM and not in Kft...i think i should re-do them in Kft because all chart of performance are in ft and i found that in 500 meter there is a diference of 10kmh at least. BTW I have a book of P47 with serial numbers, and in a web that i found there are all p47s. But problem is it doesn t say when arrived to England, else when they crashed or were retired. Looking for serial numbers of P47D5 (42-8403->8702) most of serial numbers were ´P47 lost in that date you said, october/november, but i found one P47D5 (i think the first to be lost), 42-8644 that was lost at MAY 21 1943. http://home.att.net/~jbaugher/1942_1.html
I really dunno if the accuracy or the range of ack has been increased, but right now (using with 50kg/100lb) the jabo missions suck - 80% of dives end up killed or green over-g warnings. I don't know much about the history of AAA, nor it's specs, but the gameplay just gotten worse, right now it's mostly kamikaze with 50kg's.
I often wonder about the lethality of auto gunners/acks/hmacks. PK is just too often to be realistic. The auto gunners and acks sometimes make me wonder if one of these are modeled for them: CIWS PAC Fire Or these.
I don't get it. The Li-2 is a one gun troop carrier. In real life it was a slow, super strong, maneuverable transport and is there are many examples still being used today. Why do they keep on making it worse and worse ???? ADMIN/DEVS : Get busy with those one wing on fire Zekes and those fully acrobatic 110s and leave the Li-2 ALONE. That is right after you set it back to the original settings, PLEASE!!!!!
I never thought i could agree with Vojtas, but mb he just got smarter.. Next thing u know , he will exit 302nd and ask to join madness... YES-50kg sux. Now is 190 with 8x50 pathetic comparing it to p47D hvy. And after 2 years i hear g4m was rps bug. Well, Exec, Ur the biggest bug fh ever made. Go re-model taba host. To hell with miracles like pe2, li2 ,tbf,pe8 ottos. This game is now "realistic" but golds still need to hit center of an ack to kill it. Like 50kg is 5kg bomb, it cant destroy jeep. Like u know how much is 50kg of explosive.
one question: P-39D's top speed was increased? I was always slower than 109F4, now I am faster in low alts. I read only something about weight balance.
