pfffffff, stupid poll stupid discussion srry, when not ask to change otto settings from buffґs to normal and correct settings, than can not here discuss for change otto from this planes, for me switch off all ottos from all planes, the ottos are jokeґs for the hunters in the game, that my 6 cent, regards mosche
CC - also think its stupid to decrease the otto of special planes. Why not decreasing ALL Ottos and in the same time increase the hitpoints of the buffs. So the ottos wouldnt be such a danger any more and on the other hand a buff has to take much more hits before it breaks apart. It would be more realistic, cause I doubt that planes like Ju88 or a B17 (which were known that they could take many hits) break apart after two or four 20mm hits (and I dont mean PK). It would also make FH more interesting, because then we would have more bomber formations with escort fighters.
I'm for decreasing otto acuracy as a whole... otto is the bigest Uber of the game here. Decreasing otto on all buffs except troop transports and both 2-seat fighters (Me110 and 410) is a very good idea IMHO. No more 410's being involved in DF's, no more yesiams/gunguns/rebcezs/(you can put a name of any other otto fighter here) rolling from attacked fields/attacking fields low and suicidal in Pe2's/Il2's/TBF's/SBD's/B-25's/B-24's/410's/G4M's/He-177's... ...would be a great thing.
Well, as frog says, we should not only talk about 410 ottos accuracy, but also, Pe2, B25, B24, B17, He177, Ju88, G4M ........ etc, etc, etc
Amen, I think anyone who has gone to shoot down a pe2 from a high six position always has a serious thought in his head " I really dont want to get where this gunner can even look at me" While In my experience flying the 410, I might as well man the gunners myself, as I have only shot down one pilot with the autos on the 410.....ever.... and maybe chased away 1 or 2 slow low armor cons. No matter, Im not near as hard pressed about autos, the La is still my biggest beef