Suggestions and questions ...

Discussion in 'TabaHost General Discussion' started by JTiger, Nov 20, 2005.

  1. JTiger

    JTiger Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2004
    Messages:
    170
    Como vai ser a questão do Me 262 no taba ? Vai sair em agosto de 44 ?
    E o Ju 88 S que os russos fizeram o "favor" de colocar em agosto de 45 ?


    Eu acho que isso seria legal assim :

    Me 262 - Só poderia voar quem tem streak de 10, ou algo assim ...

    Ju 88 S - Só poderia voar quem tem bastante pontos de bomber ...

    E até outros aviões, como o 190D-9 deveria ser assim ... considerando que esse avião era um "luxo" alemão ... :]

    Infelizmente ( ou felizmente ), os aliados tinham muito dinheiro sobrando, e então produziam Corsairs, Mustangs, Spitfires feito loucos ...

    Já alguns aviões russos, como os La 5 pra frente, deveriam ser limitados por field ( tipo 5 ou 6 por field )

    Aviões bem raros ( Pe 8 ) deveriam ter 2 ou 3 por field ( na verdade nem sei porque os russos colocaram o Pe-8 aqui ... deveriam ter colocado algo como um Wellington ou Lancaster ).

    Bom, é isso que eu acho ... talvez daria certo, espero que analizem a proposta ... :cheers:
     
  2. -exec-

    -exec- FH Consultant

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2000
    Messages:
    24,690
    Location:
    xUSSR
    let's trade :)

    variant A:
    golds get me-262 in 1944-10 (not EKdo.262, but Kommando Nowotny )
    reds get pe-8 in 1941-08 as tb-7(ant-42), not as 1942-02 Lancaster.

    variant B:
    reds get Me 262 at the same time (or one month later) as golds get Me 262A-1a
    this red Me 262 will simulate Meteor I of 616Sqn (that intercepted first V-1 (Fi 103) on 27-07-1944).

    ;)
     
  3. ppedott_vibora

    ppedott_vibora Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2001
    Messages:
    2,292
    Location:
    Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil
    I like both...
    :)
     
  4. -exec-

    -exec- FH Consultant

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2000
    Messages:
    24,690
    Location:
    xUSSR
    suggestion:

    pe-8 1942-01
    tb-7(later renamed to pe-8) made first raid to berlin 1941-08, along with db-3f and yer-2.
    lancaster's first action 1942-01. i think that 1942-01 reds can have heavy bomber already.

    me-262 1944-10, kommando nowotny operational status and first sortees.

    meteor i/iii, 1945-02 (simulated by me 262)
    616sqn intercepted first v-1 in combat patrol in 1944-08.
    616sqn moved to belgium 1945-02. well it's made first air-to-ground sortee 1945-04, but considering 616 is combat ready and active since 1944-08 i think we can allow it since 1945-02.

    i warn you that when taba will be as popular as ma, people will flame about these dates.
     
  5. hugo baskervill

    hugo baskervill Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2004
    Messages:
    824
    Location:
    Březnice u Zlína, Czech Republic
    I vote variant A, there arent too deadly ottos like in MA so pe8 will not so deadly too.

    I think WB otto aiming model is optimized for 12mm gun, that is why 20mm ottos cant hit and 7mm ottos arent so accurate, and b17 is killing machine.
     
  6. ppedott_vibora

    ppedott_vibora Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2001
    Messages:
    2,292
    Location:
    Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil
     
  7. ppedott_vibora

    ppedott_vibora Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2001
    Messages:
    2,292
    Location:
    Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil
    Exec, what you think to do a poll about TH RPS?
    here: http://www.meiradarocha.jor.br/uploads/579/270/rps_work3.xls
    we can dl the spread sheet that we use to set TH RPS, mb people can read it and vote some tunning, keeping in mind the TH Concept (Tactical/Strategical issues).
    :)
     
    Last edited: Nov 21, 2005
  8. -exec-

    -exec- FH Consultant

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2000
    Messages:
    24,690
    Location:
    xUSSR
    impossible to download properly. always partially and broken.
    zip it.
     
  9. ppedott_vibora

    ppedott_vibora Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2001
    Messages:
    2,292
    Location:
    Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil
    fixed, transfered to Canadian host
     
  10. -exec-

    -exec- FH Consultant

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2000
    Messages:
    24,690
    Location:
    xUSSR
    file still unreadable, thogh file downloaded correctly %)
    what does mean 4 19420201 19450815 12 16 32 0 0 0 0 Ki84-Ia ?
     
  11. ppedott_vibora

    ppedott_vibora Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2001
    Messages:
    2,292
    Location:
    Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil
    Curious... becouse I just read your post, D/L it and its perfectly readable...
    btw...

    Code:
     
    4             Country of the plane
    19420201      date of RPS entry for Hayate but the right is 19440201
    19450815      Finish date for Hayate
    12            # of available Hayates at small fields
    16            # of available Hayates at medium fields      
    32            # of available Hayates at Big fields      
    0             # of available Hayates at CV fields      
    0             # of available Hayates at Cargo "fields"      
    0             # of available Hayates at DD  "fields"      
    0             # of available Hayates at submarine "fields"      
    Ki84-Ia       Official name of one of my prefered planes and my old bike (Hayate)
    
     
  12. JTiger

    JTiger Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2004
    Messages:
    170
    Exec, is possible to mix variant A and B ... :

    golds get me-262 in 1944-10 (not EKdo.262, but Kommando Nowotny )
    reds get pe-8 in 1941-08 as tb-7(ant-42), not as 1942-02 Lancaster and reds get Me 262 one month later as golds get Me 262A-a. This red Me 262 will simulate Meteor I of 616Sqn (that intercepted first V-1 (Fi 103) on 27-07-1944).

    And, in new free host launcher, make the Gloster Meteor ...
    That's it ... I've totally agreed ... :cheers:
     
  13. -exec-

    -exec- FH Consultant

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2000
    Messages:
    24,690
    Location:
    xUSSR
    cargo field is static commercial vessels?
    submarine field?
    destroyer ship fields?
    imho these are all not startable. :dunno:
    16 per medium field? could you remind provision rules?

    yes, i see the file in excel, but i mean that it was not understandable :)
    see some typos, such as ju 87d-5. will answer asap.
     
  14. -exec-

    -exec- FH Consultant

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2000
    Messages:
    24,690
    Location:
    xUSSR
    meteor won't be available until... ahem. dunno.
    actually i hate jets in prop game.
    so i gonna make the poll.
     
  15. Broz

    Broz Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2002
    Messages:
    8,830
    Location:
    Salamanca (España)
    I'd be happy without jets as well. Pls, exec, abuse a bit your superpowers and make them dissapear :D:D
     
  16. ppedott_vibora

    ppedott_vibora Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2001
    Messages:
    2,292
    Location:
    Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil
    In some maps (NGS2, Tobruk, South Pac) you have sailing at seas convoys that not contain CV, as Cargo Ships Convoys, Destroyers/Cruisers convoys and alone submarines.
    As this is classified by terrain as "CV Fleet", I mean, It starts from one point and follows a route, it can be attached planes...
    So we did the follow:
    cargo field: 2 fighter/recon/fleet deffense planes (Sea Hurri/109T1/A6m2b class planes)
    submarine: Sen Toku... 3 N1K1j planes - emulating D4Y
    destroyer: same of Cargo ships but no implemented yet I gess...
    BTW, as I always said, community is welcome not only to join project as well to correct mistakes!
    :)
     
  17. JTiger

    JTiger Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2004
    Messages:
    170
    Vibora, there was only ONE Sen-Toku. And was sunk before really attack something.
     
  18. ppedott_vibora

    ppedott_vibora Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2001
    Messages:
    2,292
    Location:
    Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil
    And you believed all THEY told?
    ;)
     
  19. -exec-

    -exec- FH Consultant

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2000
    Messages:
    24,690
    Location:
    xUSSR
    d4y? may be m6a seiran? :)
     
  20. JTiger

    JTiger Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2004
    Messages:
    170
    Yes, It was Seiran ... :}

    I was not there to see what really happen vibora ... :D