sux russian ".attach" feature : proposal

Discussion in 'Warbirds International' started by pietas, Feb 22, 2007.

?

Fighter streak >= 6 makes ".attach" disabled

  1. Yeah, sure, I'm on it!

    3.8%
  2. No, never, fuck off loser!

    30.8%
  3. I don't give a shit.

    23.1%
  4. Russian programmers are lame even

    19.2%
  5. pietas is a woodpecker (added by exec)

    50.0%
Multiple votes are allowed.
  1. Red Ant

    Red Ant Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2002
    Messages:
    4,946
    Location:
    Germany
    Re: sux russian ".attach" feature : proposal

    Another option to consider might be to simply disable the map view if you're attached to someone. This would at least make it harder to ascertain the attachee's position.
     
  2. mosche

    mosche Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2002
    Messages:
    1,803
    Location:
    Fьr Andrй, Sьdschweden
    Re: sux russian ".attach" feature : proposal

    .attach pietas
     
    1 person likes this.
  3. FranzAugust

    FranzAugust Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2002
    Messages:
    1,444
    Location:
    Germany
    Re: sux russian ".attach" feature : proposal

    It looks like this discussion is funny for the stinking vodka drinkers :alc:
     
  4. vasco

    vasco Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2005
    Messages:
    3,688
    Re: sux russian ".attach" feature : proposal

    LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL :D
     
  5. Boroda

    Boroda FH Community Officer

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2000
    Messages:
    6,279
    Location:
    Moscow
    Re: sux russian ".attach" feature : proposal

    Two.
     
  6. looseleaf

    looseleaf Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2006
    Messages:
    5,026
    Re: sux russian ".attach" feature : proposal

    If the attach comand is for "educational purposes"....

    ...then the person being attached should have the power to refuse attachment or the person should at the very least be advised that he/she is being attached.

    It should be announced to all the player who is attaching to whom.
     
  7. laxtsc

    laxtsc Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2004
    Messages:
    875
    Location:
    Poland
    Re: sux russian ".attach" feature : proposal

    Yeah. Magic command ".allowattach 0|1" could do fine job :)
     
  8. skycpt

    skycpt Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2005
    Messages:
    224
    Location:
    Chicago, IL
    Re: sux russian ".attach" feature : proposal

    As much as this is near and dear to my heart. .attach will unfortunately be here to stay. Why? Because if it hasnt been removed by now it wont be. Not because it cant be, TabaHost nixed the .attach command ages ago. Not because they want to use it for training, TabaHost has the .shanghai command. Not because there is a strong support vocal support for .attach. Nope, Its called they enjoy the convienence of spying. Not to mention rendering all guns on a buff useless when attached to. Have a notification display on the screen is useless with all the chatter and text scrolling.

    Do away with .attach. Impliment 30min timed Ban on switching sides. Impliment announcement and display with .ros of who shares the same IP. Only then will the spying stop. You cant ridicule us for being paranoid and then state "I've been using .attach liberally lately".

    This topic is a bloody pulp which used to be a horse.
     
  9. tigrou

    tigrou Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2004
    Messages:
    1,258
    Location:
    toulouse
    Re: sux russian ".attach" feature : proposal

    as every tree month, when new poll about jeeps? :D
     
  10. -ong--

    -ong-- New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2006
    Messages:
    1
    Location:
    Gdańsk, Poland
    Re: sux russian ".attach" feature : proposal

    I think that if it is for educational purposes it should only be allowed to for a squad members to attach to each other otherwise should be .allowattach 0|1.
    Regards
    ong