Re: Hey Uncles, Thermate Man says "Hi" It doesn't matter if you're fuckin nuts or not. This thermate stuff does quite a number on paint jobs too. RINGGGGGGGGGG Thermate Man: "Hi Uncles? When ya comin' over? I need my balls licked asap! What the fuck is goin on anyway? Uncles: "Uhh Yeah I know its been a couple of days, but uh, things here in New York are kinda screwed up..The buses aren't running cuz there's this shit in the clouds of pulverized concrete that is burning the paint jobs off of all the vehicles..Like there is something burning the fuck out of everything around here..it's definately not normal. Uhhh anyway I'll just call a cab, get those balls ready, I'm on the way over" OOO LA LA!!!! Uncles, you lick good!! maybe next week I can get you started on my.. COCK.
Re: Hey Uncles, Thermate Man says "Hi" So what, you are a gay man? I am not. Leave me alone. I am happily married to a woman. Go away.
Re: Hey Uncles, Thermate Man says "Hi" YEAH, I know how thermate man ended up a few seconds after those pics of his in nylons were taken :> You wouldn't want to end up like that hehe
Re: Hey Uncles, Thermate Man says "Hi" Lick here Ok Uncles, now I want you to start off licking that little line that separates my balls....Yeah...right there....heh heh, yeah, just like that....keep going...oh Fuck yeah...hehe heheh...ok now lick all around in big circles, I said BIG circles you lickaholic, heh heh..Ok now run your tongue up the shaft..and I want you to repeat after me "there was no thermate used at the World trade center on sept 11, 2001" Yeah, good boy, now go back to lickin my balls, swirl your tongue all around,, oh fuck yeah...keep going...OKay now grab my cock with your hand and start jackin it...Did I say you could stop lickin my balls? No, of course not!! heh heh Just because I asked you to speak a few words doesn't mean you get to stop lickin my balls...heh heh..Okay good boy..lick lick lick....oh man you're good at this.heh heh Oh fuck yeah, keep goin, keep goin, lick those balls baby, lick 'em good....heh heh... You don't like the smell? the smell of my balls? Hey, what do you expect, you lick them twice a day for 2 months, and I haven't showered in 2 months, so Yeah, my balls are gonna stink, gee wow you're smart, Uncles. keep licking...heh heh..oh yeah, just like that... What's wrong? you look a little scared...You ain't afraid of lickin' thermate man's balls are you? what's that you say? No? heh heh, that's what I thought you would say. heh heh You better hurry up Uncles, you never know when your old lady is gonna open up the door and start askin you what all the lickin and slurpin sounds are about...heh heh..ohh fuck yeah that feels nice...real nice..oh fuck yeah.. See you in your dreams Uncles....get that tongue ready...
Re: Hey Uncles, Thermate Man says "Hi" Uncles, you don't look so good....take a well deserved break...go outside, get a breath of fresh air.. Only believe eyewitnesses? no problem
Re: Hey Uncles, Thermate Man says "Hi" I'm confused. Is Mcloud making fun of Uncles for believing the conspiracy theory, or not believing it?
Re: Hey Uncles, Thermate Man says "Hi" Dr. David Ray Griffin, noted author and theologian Says Controlled Demolition is Now a Fact, Not a Theory. In two speeches to overflow crowds in New York last weekend, notable theologian David Ray Griffin argued that recently revealed evidence seals the case that the Twin Towers and WTC-7 were destroyed by controlled demolition with explosives. Despite the many enduring mysteries of the 9/11 attacks, Dr. Griffin concluded, "It is already possible to know, beyond a reasonable doubt, one very important thing: the destruction of the World Trade Center was an inside job, orchestrated by terrorists within our own government." On Oct. 15th and 16th, New Yorkers filled two venues to hear the prominent theologian and author of two books on 9/11 give a presentation entitled "The Destruction of the Trade Towers: A Christian Theologian Speaks Out." Dr. Griffin has continued to blaze a trail of courage, leading where most media and elected officials have feared to tread. His presentation went straight to the core of one of the most powerful indictments of the official story, the collapse of the towers and WTC 7. Dr. Griffin included excerpts from the firemen's tapes which were recently released as a result of a prolonged court battle led by victim's families represented by attorney Norman Siegel and reported in the NY Times. He also included statements by many witnesses. These sources gave ample testimony giving evidence of explosions going off in the buildings. A 12 minute film was shown for the audiences, who saw for themselves the undeniable evidence for controlled demolition. Dr. Griffin listed ten characteristics of the collapses which all indicate that the buildings did not fall due to being struck by planes or the ensuing fires. He explained the buildings fell suddenly without any indication of collapse. They fell straight into their own footprint at free-fall speed, meeting virtually no resistance as they fell--a physical impossibility unless all vertical support was being progressively removed by explosives severing the core columns. The towers were built to withstand the impact of a Boeing 707 and 160 mile per hour winds, and nothing about the plane crashes or ensuing fires gave any indication of causing the kind of damage that would be necessary to trigger even a partial or progressive collapse, much less the shredding of the buildings into dust and fragments that could drop at free-fall speed. The massive core columns--the most significant structural feature of the buildings, whose very existence is denied in the official 9/11 Commission Report--were severed into uniform 30 foot sections, just right for the 30-foot trucks used to remove them quickly before a real investigation could transpire. There was a volcanic-like dust cloud from the concrete being pulverized, and no physical mechanism other than explosives can begin to explain how so much of the buildings' concrete was rendered into extremely fine dust. The debris was ejected horizontally several hundred feet in huge fan shaped plumes stretching in all directions, with telltale "squibs" following the path of the explosives downward. These are all facts that have been avoided by mainstream and even most of the alternative media. Again, these are characteristics of the kind of controlled demolitions that news people and firefighters were describing on the morning of 9/11. Those multiple first-person descriptions of controlled demolition were hidden away for almost four years by the City of New York until a lawsuit finally forced the city to release them. Dr. Griffin's study of these accounts has led him beyond his earlier questioning of the official story of the collapses, to his above-quoted conclusion: The destruction of the three WTC buildings with explosives by U.S. government terrorists is no longer a hypothesis, but a fact that has been proved beyond a reasonable doubt. It's important to note that Dr. Griffin is one of many prominent intellectuals--including the likes of Gore Vidal, Howard Zinn, Peter Dale Scott, Richard Falk, Paul Craig Roberts, Morgan Reynolds and Peter Phillips--who have seen through the major discrepancies of the official explanation of 9/11 and have risen to challenge it. These brave individuals represent the tip of an ever-growing iceberg of discreet 9/11 skeptics. Indeed, 9/11 skepticism appears to be almost universal among intellectuals who have examined the evidence, since there has not yet been a single serious attempt to refute the case developed by Dr. Griffin and such like-minded thinkers as Nafeez Ahmed and Mike Ruppert. As for the general public, polls have shown that a strong majority of Canadians (63%, Toronto Star, May '04) and half of New Yorkers (Zogby, August 2004) agree that top U.S. leaders conspired to murder nearly 3,000 Americans on 9/11/01. How, then, can the mainstream U.S. media continue to ignore the story of the century? Perhaps the best answer was given by Dr. Griffin himself in the conclusion of his talk, and is worth quoting at length: "The evidence for this conclusion (that 9/11 was an inside job) has thus far been largely ignored by the mainstream press, perhaps under the guise of obeying President Bush's advice not to tolerate "outrageous conspiracy theories." We have seen, however, that it is the Bush administration's conspiracy theory that is the outrageous one, because it is violently contradicted by numerous facts, including some basic laws of physics. "There is, of course, another reason why the mainstream press has not pointed out these contradictions. As a recent letter to the Los Angeles Times said: "'The number of contradictions in the official version of . . . 9/11 is so overwhelming that . . . it simply cannot be believed. Yet . . . the official version cannot be abandoned because the implication of rejecting it is far too disturbing: that we are subject to a government conspiracy of 'X-Files' proportions and insidiousness.' "The implications are indeed disturbing. Many people who know or at least suspect the truth about 9/11 probably believe that revealing it would be so disturbing to the American psyche, the American form of government, and global stability that it is better to pretend to believe the official version. I would suggest, however, that any merit this argument may have had earlier has been overcome by more recent events and realizations. Far more devastating to the American psyche, the American form of government, and the world as a whole will be the continued rule of those who brought us 9/11, because the values reflected in that horrendous event have been reflected in the Bush administration's lies to justify the attack on Iraq, its disregard for environmental science and the Bill of Rights, its criminal negligence both before and after Katrina, and now its apparent plan not only to weaponize space but also to authorize the use of nuclear weapons in a preemptive strike. " In light of this situation and the facts discussed in this lecture---as well as dozens of more problems in the official account of 9/11 discussed elsewhere---I call on the New York Times to take the lead in finally exposing to the American people and the world the truth about 9/11. Taking the lead on such a story will, of course, involve enormous risks. But if there is any news organization with the power, the prestige, and the credibility to break this story, it is the Times. It performed yeoman service in getting the 9/11 oral histories released. But now the welfare of our republic and perhaps even the survival of our civilization depend on getting the truth about 9/11 exposed. I am calling on the Times to rise to the occasion. Dr. Griffin's speech given at the University of Wisconsin earlier this year, entitled "9/11 and the American Empire," was broadcast twice on C-SPAN. In late September Dr. Griffin was asked to give expert testimony at hearings sponsored by Cynthia McKinney and the Congressional Black Caucus investigating the 9/11 Commission Report. He is currently Professor Emeritus at Claremont College in California. There are 7 types of people that still think 19 arabs with box cutters pulled off 9-11 1: idiots 2: ball lickers 3: masons 4: owl worshippers 5: goat bangers 6: chickenfuckers %) 7: gorilla cock smokers
Re: Hey Uncles, Thermate Man says "Hi" Thermate man can't fight. He's tied to uncles bed, somewhere in one of the 5 boroughs of new york, getting his balls licked twice a day, 7 days a week. When will the nightmare end? I don' know, but I think uncles is gonna have another ptsd/denial related freak outs pretty soon, like within the next day or two. ie uncles: "FUCK YOU ALL SHIT ASSED MOTHERFUCKERS THERE WAS NO THERMATE USED IN WTC AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
Re: Hey Uncles, Thermate Man says "Hi" Mcloud, just link to the Zeitgeist movie. Ah hell I'll do it myself. http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-594683847743189197 www.zeitgeistmovie.com (for other languages)
every1 has that friend that says: "dont go to that restaurant, waste of time" "dont buy that car, piece of junk" "dont read that book, no point" some1 who can give u advice because he's done it before wikipedia can be that friend "dont watch that movie, pile of shit"
Re: Hey Uncles, Thermate Man says "Hi" Let's have a little sing along: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xp9852hq0W0 Lunatic Fringe from the Red Rider LP "As Far As Siam" Lunatic fringe I know you're out there You're in hiding And you hold your meetings We can hear you coming We know what you're after We're wise to you this time We won't let you kill the laughter. Lunatic fringe In the twilight's last gleaming This is open season But you won't get too far We know you've got to blame someone For your own confusion But we're on guard this time Against your final solution We can hear you coming (We can hear you coming) No you're not going to win this time We can hear the footsteps (We can hear the footsteps) Way out along the walkway Lunatic fringe We know you're out there But in these new dark ages There will still be light An eye for an eye; Well before you go under... Can you feel the resistance? Can you feel the thunder? Transcribed by Rich Kulawiec, rsk@ecn.purdue.edu
nobody wants to sing along with u it's like in this video (starting at 2:15) when u start a sing along, your loved ones are driven insane to the point that some jump into a lake of acid
Re: Hey Uncles, Thermate Man says "Hi" I've already read the wikipedia criticisms. Oh yes, how credible. It doesn't bear mentioning that you should take everything you see and hear with a grain of salt, because everyone should already know that, but apparently not. Everything is worth watching as long as you are critical in absorbing information. Anyone who would take your advice is a tool.
Re: Hey Uncles, Thermate Man says "Hi" From: http://www.tomcochrane.info/tomcochrane.php Tom Cochrane, Canadian, Honorary Colonel Canadian Air Force. "the thinking man's rocker". The Stories Behind Tom's Songs Lunatic Fringe "Those who don't remember history are doomed to repeat it." "I'm paraphrasing but it goes something like that. A series of events inspired this song. I was going out with a Jewish girl at the time and I was disturbed by anti-Semitic bombings in Paris, by the lunacy of revisionist historians, by various neo-Nazi groups gaining strength in Canada, and by a book I had read about Raoul Wallenberg, a Swedish diplomat who, like Schindler, helped thousands of Jews escape Europe during WWII. My manager at the time told me that there was no place for lyrics like these in this disposable pop world, and I was almost ready to cave in and accept this as a given. But the night we recorded the demo of 'Fringe', Fraser Hill, the engineer, told me over the studio monitor system that John Lennon was dead... Man, that hit me hard - as it did so many people. Lennon had always spoken his mind, always tried to write the truth, always went about his work with integrity. And I thought, for better or worse, I would try to use his example as the touchstone for my own writing. The irony is that 'Lunatic Fringe' went on to become one of my most successful and enduring songs, still is." - Tom Cochrane Very impressive.
Re: Hey Uncles, Thermate Man says "Hi" What a great song to listen just before going out to kick some serious ass!! Eh, Fuckie-boy?