You really think this is good idea? I am scared of everything that can limit player's freedom in game.. Do u remember how much we complained about planes that simply vanish after few months? Now imagine situation where u cant fly 190 but it is out, nor u can fly 109 because many players on ...How would u feel in ki43?
I have not problem with Ki-43, this shit is not my favourite, but as I wrote- np. I love long trips so I could to take off from a far-away fld (good for climb anyway). And remember- it's only for 2-3 month, good for balance (it's simple irl war rearmament simulation).
Actualy reds have FN much more then IRL, by the end of 1943 about 3% of acting soviet fighters were fn. Main force still were yak7 and yak9. Even Lagg3 was produced in autumn 43 in greater quantities than La5fn. So i think it will be nice to return it back to early 44 as it was in 1.66, mb a months earlier then 109g14.
yes, very good Gil, that is ok idea That is all i can say on this subject, because as someone who really loves La and who plans to fly new model more often, i still think we dont need FN model at all.. Have no problem with flying only 5 and 5F, at all.... So i will shut up
in IL2 we have plane limits and it is a good idea, it greatly reduces the ludicrous situations when 99% of people fly only one uber type of plane BUT in wb there's still a problem of not enough of players...
There is multiplier that does it work again with scorepage up, so if fn will be moved later in rps and it's magic turn will be fixed (from 17-18 sec to about 20 with full fuel), i think at least this problem will be solved . Btw "golds on Ki-84" problem too, as it's is used 1-st of all as a special anti-La plane and not best choice vs spit LF, tempest or P-51. PS. glad for ur oK pings men, hope see u all at arena after 10-th jan or so .
Sure it is, tod after 1942 is called Russian-Japanese war But then again problem is f4u4, g10 etc etc etc , but lets not start with that Ull be more than welcome