the problem here is the 4th used video in that case, but no for the goal not credited vs corea for ex.
zidane quit with style, yup. a funny style, but he did! xD great player, but that scene was incredible! here are some photoshop skillz (not mine) working on it: http://www.upshizzle.com/gallery/albums/uploaded/zidanesf9ee.gif http://img210.imageshack.us/img210/8734/sagat4ew.jpg http://img110.imageshack.us/img110/2808/zi033dd.gif http://img288.imageshack.us/img288/4687/zi084xp.gif etc
nope, winning is when you actually have someone to compete with about that de rossi offside: the rules are clear - the ref can only stop the play if a player receiving a pass was on an offside position in the moment of starting that pass in other words - de rossi was on an offside position, but he did not recive the pass, thus no offside, legit goal
Then if you don´t have competence because you were way better...you dont win? xD if he had no one to compete why do you ask him to retire? where are your critizism to the other top crack players (who as you said were no competence for zidane). the rule about the offside also includes that if the player particpates in the game in any way ,even if he is not reciving the pass (f.e by moving in a cross pass , or interfering with the defence movment) he is also in offside...(new fifa rule from last year) considering that...i would give offside
im not sure if zidane was the best player, but whats the difference winning is to be best from all participants, no matter if they suck or not, wtf if you meet 3 noobs in arena and killem all, who wins? you, them, nobody? id say you win now, how many noobs do you have in wc, in ply off stage? ;p as for offside if the other player attracted ANY attention from gk ref could decided offside however in this case goal should be counted imo
well it was a final, so all decisions had to be 100% strictly legit I know about that part of the Offside Story too, I was testing you