WBFH 1.65

Discussion in 'Warbirds International' started by Allsop, Sep 9, 2005.

  1. Allsop

    Allsop Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2004
    Messages:
    2,200
    Location:
    U.S.A. Washington State
    Now before you guys think this thread is dissing hear me out.

    Ive only flown wb 1.65 for maybe 5-6 hours total. And I have to say, Im much more happy with it.

    Now, I can almost depend on a 109 outclimbing a spit to safety. I can bet that even though a zero does feel as sharp as a samurai sword, that with good planing, I can win a dog fight.

    the only thing Im still not quiet sure about is the DM, but late war will tell us that. As far as the ju88s, I think its bomb load is pathetic, but 1-2 of them would be god for very strategic bombing such as radars, and downing economy a few 250's at a time.

    Im liking it much better, thank you admins. :cheers:
     
  2. RolandGarros

    RolandGarros Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2003
    Messages:
    2,867
    you ingrate, all you ever do is dissing FH
     
  3. Broz

    Broz Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2002
    Messages:
    8,830
    Location:
    Salamanca (España)
    omg :eek:

    Allsop congratulating someone... the end of world must be near and he needs redemption or something? :)
     
  4. Snakeye

    Snakeye Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2001
    Messages:
    3,232
    Location:
    EPWA
    he must be getting old...
     
    1 person likes this.
  5. Broz

    Broz Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2002
    Messages:
    8,830
    Location:
    Salamanca (España)
    nahh, i don't think so :)
     
  6. Allsop

    Allsop Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2004
    Messages:
    2,200
    Location:
    U.S.A. Washington State
    Jesus Christ guys, do you not agree?

    I mean, I still think the a6m should feel more responsive and what not, and Im sure there are other planes that need help. But the a6m is no longer the brick that can outdive an f4f. A 109 can climb better than a spit now, and not by that little bit that makes admins feel like its still justified, you can actually feel a better rate of climb.

    i flew a6m off cv a few times. And it still eventually reaches good speed, but for the most part, stays high 200 low 300km/h where it turns well....I cant explain it, but now alot of things fell right here at wbfh.
     
  7. Broz

    Broz Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2002
    Messages:
    8,830
    Location:
    Salamanca (España)
    I agree. It's only that watching you congratulating someone is so... so... so little Allsoapish :D
     
  8. hugo baskervill

    hugo baskervill Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2004
    Messages:
    825
    Location:
    Březnice u Zlína, Czech Republic
    cc 1.65 is step on good way.

    But imho spit V and 109F still have very similar climb rate, this different may be about 1-2m/s at low alts, but maybe it was IRL too.
     
  9. Allsop

    Allsop Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2004
    Messages:
    2,200
    Location:
    U.S.A. Washington State
    I think the main difference, is the spitfire still manoovers well, while the 109f's are like lawn darts. They are good for snappy up and downs. I also beleive the spitfire still keeps with 190's and 109's in climbs a little to well. But its only 1.65, and I think its a very good change from 1.64.
     
  10. Arafat

    Arafat Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2005
    Messages:
    18
    Location:
    Ramallah - Palestine
    Man, broz is really a dickhead...why does he always attack someone, even when it´s right? Sounds pathetic.
     
  11. airfax

    airfax Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2001
    Messages:
    3,222
    Location:
    Tampere,Finland
    Well, after 2100 whining posts it is quite surprising (but nice) to see allsop giving some positive lines about FH...

    :D
     
    1 person likes this.
  12. graatz

    graatz Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2005
    Messages:
    916
    And who are you Ararat, with your 4 posts, registered for 2 days now, sticking to someone else's sq, and telling people who broz REALLY is and what he ALWAYS does?
     
    Last edited: Sep 9, 2005
    3 people like this.
  13. jfm

    jfm Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2003
    Messages:
    848
    .clear ;)
     
    1 person likes this.
  14. Broz

    Broz Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2002
    Messages:
    8,830
    Location:
    Salamanca (España)
    lol. Another ego?

    Btw, for once i didn't attack him. Just said i was impressed for him congratulating. You fuckhead
     
  15. Allsop

    Allsop Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2004
    Messages:
    2,200
    Location:
    U.S.A. Washington State
    haha, I had to wonder too, personally, I thought arafat was broz or afi, just because making a terrorist nick seems right up their alley.
     
  16. Fucketeer

    Fucketeer Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2005
    Messages:
    3,280
    Looks like, but time will tell. ;)
     
  17. Broz

    Broz Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2002
    Messages:
    8,830
    Location:
    Salamanca (España)
    No, i have better taste. Anyway, i don't think Arafat was a terrorist. At least no more than Sharon or G.W. Bush are.
     
    1 person likes this.
  18. -afi--

    -afi-- Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2002
    Messages:
    2,046
    Location:
    new york, the united states
    bingo
     
    1 person likes this.
  19. Fucketeer

    Fucketeer Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2005
    Messages:
    3,280
    Guess this plane!

    [​IMG]
     
  20. muf-lo

    muf-lo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2003
    Messages:
    547
    Location:
    Me? LAN
    Airbush
     
    2 people like this.