Since tpak said that yak9t was better then the 109k4, here are a few links (from a russian site) of the performances of the Yak9T, Yak9D and the 109K4: http://www.airwar.ru/enc_e/fww2/bf109k.html http://www.airwar.ru/enc_e/fww2/yak9.html http://www.airwar.ru/enc_e/fww2/yak9d.html ho, and btw the yak9 acording to the site was released in 1942 (but i doubt it that the T version was produced in suficient numbers at that time). ------------------ platy- Sturmtruppen
platy (and all others) do not trust this site 100% becouse SOME (afair 15-20%) planes have somewhat wrong data there... i have more reliable sources for compare... ------------------ Roman aka rgreat
How do you decide which source is more reliable than the other? (I had such problem when i worked on Belgrade scenario. Number of kills never was the same. ).
Yes i would really like to know where to you get those statts, because if yours is right, then all the other sources are wrong ------------------ platy- Sturmtruppen
right and wrong... good and evil... truth and lies... anyone interested in a philosophical discussion? mcosta Sturmtruppen
regreat how do you know its not your data that is wrong? is it because your data saying the yak was better but because this one says otherwise it must be wrong cause we wouldnt want to change any red ubber planes now would we?
im not interested in philosofical discussions right now, but i just wanna say i hate 30/37mm cannons! they ruin the game i like the brute 7mm to 20mm fights ok.. i hate those 88mm flaks too
