Loadout of spitfires

Discussion in 'Warbirds International' started by bazura, May 26, 2004.

  1. bazura

    bazura Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2002
    Messages:
    222
    Location:
    Hispania
    Today I stumbled on this thread at UBI's Il-2 forum:

    http://ubbxforums.ubi.com/6/ubb.x?a=tpc&s=400102&f=63110913&m=334105824



    Maybe interesting for developers.

    BTW, another quote:

    I know, I know, already discussed...but I couldn't resist :D

    greetings
     
    Last edited: May 26, 2004
  2. RolandGarros

    RolandGarros Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2003
    Messages:
    2,867
    odd this came up, i just recently got a book that has spit9 picture with 3 bombs loaded, looks like maybe 500lb on centerline & 2 smaller bombs on wings maybe 100 pounders - havent got to those chapters yet, pilot is still in hurricane 1
     
  3. -exec-

    -exec- FH Consultant

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2000
    Messages:
    24,690
    Location:
    xUSSR
  4. newtry

    newtry Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2002
    Messages:
    975
    It doesnt matter coz all Spits from V and later were able to carry three bombs

    "1941 the higher-powered 1,440 Merlin 45 engine was brought into service and so began the Spitfire V series. The Spitfire V had a higher top speed of 369mph, and a higher loaded weight of 6,417lbs. The Spitfire Mk V was also capable of carrying a variety of different weaponry arrangements. The Mk VA was armed with eight .303 Browning MG's, the VB with two 20mm Hispano cannon and four .303 Browning MG's. The VC model was fitted with the "Universal" wing, which could be fitted with either the eight Browning's, or the 20mm/Browning combination. The universal wing could also carry two 250lb (13kg) bombs. Each of these three wings was also capable of carrying a 500lb (227kg) bomb or tank on a centreline rack."

    [​IMG]
     
  5. beryl

    beryl Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2002
    Messages:
    1,788
    Location:
    19*08'E 51*30'N
    come on,Spit is fighter, not Il-2, don't use it for ground attacks
     
  6. Broz

    Broz Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2002
    Messages:
    8,830
    Location:
    Salamanca (EspaƱa)
    That's the idea of a jabo. A fighter that can be used for ground attacks....
     
  7. tigrou

    tigrou Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2004
    Messages:
    1,258
    Location:
    toulouse
    if it can load bombs , it's not to AA fights ;)
     
  8. -frog-

    -frog- Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2003
    Messages:
    5,303
    C'mon- i do jabo very often here... It would be nice to have a 3-bomb loadout in Spit as the reds do have probs with jabos in 1941 (just to compare- a 4 bomb loadout of 109E and 109F4 and 2x250 in ki43 or 2x500 in Me110... simply unfair for an egg-centred pilot like I'am... there are pilots who really don't like rox :( )

    So? Is there any chance of 500+2x100lbs ordnance being fitted onto Spit V?
     
  9. -exec-

    -exec- FH Consultant

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2000
    Messages:
    24,690
    Location:
    xUSSR
    personally, i don't see any provements.
     
  10. newtry

    newtry Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2002
    Messages:
    975
    Yes, sure, no provement except the fact that Spits from V and later had ability to carry 2 bombs under wings and one more bomb under fuz.

    "1941 the higher-powered 1,440 Merlin 45 engine was brought into service and so began the Spitfire V series. The Spitfire V had a higher top speed of 369mph, and a higher loaded weight of 6,417lbs. The Spitfire Mk V was also capable of carrying a variety of different weaponry arrangements. The Mk VA was armed with eight .303 Browning MG's, the VB with two 20mm Hispano cannon and four .303 Browning MG's. The VC model was fitted with the "Universal" wing, which could be fitted with either the eight Browning's, or the 20mm/Browning combination. The universal wing could also carry two 250lb (13kg) bombs. Each of these three wings was also capable of carrying a 500lb (227kg) bomb or tank on a centreline rack."

    "Bomb racks were fitted to the centreline and wings of these machines. Whereas the centreline rack was a seemingly makeshift contraption made up of "L" section steel bars, the underwing racks, positioned under the middle of the cannon bay, were of a more conventional, streamlined appearance. The centreline rack could carry a 500lbs. bomb, the underwing racks one 250lbs. bomb each. At least some of the machines with wing racks had deflection plates fitted to the cartridge ejection chutes."
     
  11. -exec-

    -exec- FH Consultant

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2000
    Messages:
    24,690
    Location:
    xUSSR
    i perfectly know that spitfire can lift 2*113kg or 1*227kg.
    moreover, ien spitfires had only one option of those (seafire 2*113 only, spit9 2*227 only (or something like that) etc...)

    i proved and insisted that rgreat must make two loadouts (2*113kg or 1*227kg) for all spitfires, so each of spitfires can enjoy selection of two weapon kits. now we have that.

    i'm not stupid.

    but actual question is
    wether spitfires carry THREE bombs SIMULTANEOUSLY in real practice?

    due to photos i gave, they technically could.
    but both photos had commentaries that RARE loadouts are displayed.

    newtry, it's XOR, not OR ;)
     
  12. newtry

    newtry Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2002
    Messages:
    975
    Where is no anything close to real life air-to-ground technic in WB. If something prevented pilots from using this loadout in all cases this doesnt mean that same reason exists in WB. Where was no such thing as "close the field" game.
     
    Last edited: May 28, 2004
  13. -exec-

    -exec- FH Consultant

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2000
    Messages:
    24,690
    Location:
    xUSSR
    of course you want rockets! :D
     
    Last edited: May 28, 2004
  14. newtry

    newtry Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2002
    Messages:
    975
    No. My wet dream is NAPALM.

    :dark:
     
  15. Malino

    Malino Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2001
    Messages:
    1,594
    Location:
    UK
    But they probably didn't because it limited the range to much to be of any use.

    Spitfires other than quick dash's across the channel to destroy the odd radar site weren't really used for A2G at all.


    Mal.
     
  16. newtry

    newtry Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2002
    Messages:
    975
    Spitfires other than quick dash's across the channel to destroy the odd radar site weren't really used for A2G at all.
    Wrong. They were used as dive-bombers in MTO.
     
  17. RolandGarros

    RolandGarros Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2003
    Messages:
    2,867
    If i had a flatbed canned i would just post the photo - but i have a stupid fax/scanner/copier combo & would have to rip the page out of the book, was Spit9 from 2nd TAC AF (Monty's JaBos) at airfield near Antwerp
     
  18. Malino

    Malino Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2001
    Messages:
    1,594
    Location:
    UK
    I thought we were talking early war........................(Spit Vb)


    Mal
     
  19. bazura

    bazura Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2002
    Messages:
    222
    Location:
    Hispania
    No comment about ammo load on spitfire XIe? :confused:

    greetings
     
  20. -exec-

    -exec- FH Consultant

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2000
    Messages:
    24,690
    Location:
    xUSSR
    the answer is simple: prove it and developers will make it.