Golds... What plane do you need most? We will look forward to update axis planes arsenal. ------------------ Roman aka rgreat from =Flying Barans=
Doesn't Luftwaffe need Focke-Wulf FW-190A-2 or FW-200C-3? Just asking Or Macchi MC.202 Folgore? Or Yokosuka D4Y2 Susei and P1Y Ginga? Use your imagination! Do Do-17/217 and He-111 really matter when Ju-88 is here? Is 109Gustav-10 so interesting and necessary? I'd be glad to see FW-190A-2, He-177, and Macchi's fighters 200, 202 and 205V. [This message has been edited by -exec- (edited 13 December 2000).]
109G10 would fill the gap between G6 and K (about 2 years time!). At speed it exceeded most of Allied counterparts, important tool to deal with La, Must and Spits in early 1944. Another craft is Japs' N1K2 Shiden George (June 1944): 40 km/h faster than Frank Ki-84, 4x20mm, maneuverability - not bad at all. I vote for He-177 as well - anyway better than strange innatural trophy hvy buffs.
axis 109g2, 109g10, 190 a2, 190a6, ki61 with 2x20, he 177, n1k2 george allies yak9T, la7, p39Q(N), pe-2, tu-2
Macci MC 202(Folgore),BF 109G-2,N1K2 "George"-this 3 fighters need for the ballance. For reds added too 3 fighters(I-16,Yak1,La5FN) and 1 attack craft IL2-Shturmovik. ------------------ jagdflieger wolfer, Jagdgeschwader 52
i do aggree with vadim. 109g -10 and He 177. Glad to find my password again !!!! By that....: Many, many , many Thanks to freehost Crew. Gunnery at know looks very good !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! And that new planes are incredible !!!!! Thank and Salute for your work Gentlemen <S>
I think Bf 109 G-10 (not G-14 that's pretty similar to the K version)is necessary actually, and a good jabo (Fw190 F or G) would be welcome too. About He 177, why not the Ju 188? As far as I know it was built in more numbers than the He 177, however I could be wrong. Also it ( the Ju188) had increased range and bombload than the Ju88A. To resume I think it wouldn't be too hard to model it starting with the base of the Ju88A. My 2 cents...
ok.. its clear to me: 109G10 - most wanted... easy to make btw... Now i need some (resonable) German data about 109g10 to compare with my sources... See you soon! maybe next rps... ------------------ Roman aka rgreat from =Flying Barans= [This message has been edited by rgreat (edited 14 December 2000).]
rgreat and don't forget bf109G-2 too.IMHO it will be worthy replacement of bf109F in 42 . ------------------ С уважением ---muz
well i must say that a hvy buff for the axis is important.. ju88 has bad bombload.. and so does g4m...! i dont understand about those fighter models.. so i dont have an opinion! ------------------ peace, nicae Axis Foreign Volunteers Squad We fly gold, of course!
==================================== nicae: ju88 has bad bombload. ==================================== You are wrong. Ju-88 has the best bombload among all twin-engine bombers. More then B-25 series. Only 4-engine B-24 and B-17 can carry more bombs. B-25 loadout is 6x500 _lbs_, i.e. 3000 lbs, approx 1370 kg. Ju-88 bombload is 4x500 _kg_ + 10x50 +kg_, i.e. 2500 kg.
rgreat wait! will you disgin the a/c? in what program do u do it? i want to! got 3dsm but too hard for me begginer...
