New RPS ->Hard Times for Gold?

I?d a little time left, if the server will be restartet. I looked at the RPS on this site, and I hope, that?s a joke. A lot of new Planes for the allies. And i?m affraid, that no one of that planes will be a bad plane ;-). But is it realistic, the planes was real.
When get the axis new planes like that? For example Ju188/288 to revalue the Ju88. The me 410 as late Version of Me110. What about an earlyer Start of Me262 (such Mai 45)? Much pilots can never fly that plane if it?s only 16 hour?s on duty...... But my dream is the Me163. It would be a good plane to Intercept buffers. Also could the MC 205 replace the Mc202 in 1943. I guess, i?ll wait a long time for that. And I know, it?s hard to do, to create a new Plane.
Wenn jeder an sich denkt, ist auch an alle gedacht......

 

komet in WB?

cc, nice plane, it have would have enough place in my garage...

but did you know that the ME163 Komet just have enough fuel to start and climb (1530 Liter ME163B-1A) and that this "fighter" afterwards operatet as glider?

and 2x30mm in glider??

would like to have this plane:
a turner like the zero, armored like the B17 "fortress", climber like the 109, 4x30mm in wings and a "schraege musik" of 75mm in spinner. than speed like ME262 and a size like the ME163 komet.....
an ashtry in cockpit and something to put my beerbottle in.

that rulez!

[ 05 January 2002: Message edited by: thomba ]</p>

 

I would be more than happy if GOLD gets the ki-61I Kai-c (http://members.tripod.de/Sentai1/index.htm).

It could be also easy to upgrade the B5N-torpedobomber into the B6N. Both planes have a very similiar design, but the B6N has much better combat values.

And I also would like to see one of the japanes army bombers - like the Nakajima ki-49 Donryu or the Mitsubishi ki-67 Hiryu or the Yokosuka P1Y1 Ginga, which were all more stable than the "Oh-I- got-a-ping,-so-I-explode-now-G4M

 

..ah new planes what about the 109K6 or 109K8

109K6 had a DB 605DCM engine
2xMG131
3xMk103
its was a smal series built in 44/45

or the K8
1xMK103
2xMK108

My vote is 109K6 <img src="graemlins/turret.gif" border="0" alt="[Turret]">

-asgar Jg13

 

The Ju-88 Nightfighter of the C- or G-series would also be an interesting plane.

 

190a2 and 190a6

 

I-153, Brewster 239(note not the much heavier dutch Brewster 339)

 

so many desires...

1. the mk103 cannon is not going to be implemented, as exec said.
2. the 262 back into '44 at it should would be enough for the late war effort.

 

Merlin P-40.


<img src="graemlins/super.gif" border="0" alt="[Super!]">

 

Me-410A or B - incoming, but version not defined yet. What do you want: earlier appearance or higher speed?

MC.205V - no plans, only my promotion.

Ju-188 - only along with Tu-2S, Ki-67, P1Y1, A-26B.

Me-262 - date of appearance is not of historic issue, but only game balance.

Me-163 is absolutely outsider of our game, imho. Personally I'll protest against it.

Ki-61-I-KAI-c - incoming. However RGreat plans some retuning of C in comparison of B. Don't know why.

Bf-109K-6 - really doubt developers want it in near future. Probably with La-7(late), Tempest.II, P-51H.

Ju-88C - no plans yet. not probably in coming version.

I-153 - coming in new version.

Bombs for Hurr1... Don't know. Flaming currently.

B6N - no plans yet. not probably in coming version.

 

Hi -exec-

Tks for informations over new planes !

My opnion is :

Me-410A or B ? - better to give the two versions!

M205V - hummm is a good promotion , we to give it later?

Me-262A - ok , not to have more commentaries on this

Me-163 <img src="graemlins/turret.gif" border="0" alt="[Turret]"> - I cc , is better He-163 salamander , I hate to come back to the base gliding.

Ki-61-I-KAI-c - huhuhu I wait for it

Bf-109K-6 , La-7(late), Tempest 2 , P-51H !!!!!! I adored, these I go to wait anxious.

Ju-88C , is better Ju-388.

in relation to the informed others, I not to still have formed opnion, yet... but have more ones...

S-79 sparviero ?
H-111 ?
D520 ?
Lancaster ?
B-26 Marauder ?

Its possible in future ?

salute all !!!

[ 12 January 2002: Message edited by: Mach-1 ]</p>

 

Exec why not finnish planes? Few Bw-239s credited hundreds of kills from russian planes, saved finland from being overrun by horders of il-2s. Or am i biased here saying it played an important role in the war?

 

In case of 410 i would prefer the B version.

 

Hi all

if can be made the version A or the B, because not them two?

Hey ILLO , in my view point , two version is better of only one , not import which being the two chosen, we have that to see, I try the two versions, we can be more effective with this airplane.

Or exists some problem technician with this?



salute all

[ 07 January 2002: Message edited by: Mach-1 ]</p>

 

Both of Hornisse-A and -B?
Sounds reasonable. Haven't thought of it. I'll suggest it to staff.

Illo, dunno. Probably staff has not enough info on Buffalo.
__________________________________________________
Folks, we need perf data for Macchi Castoldi MC.205V/III veltro. The only thing I know that it is Folgore with DB605A instead of DB601N, and MG151 instead of Safat.5". Uncertain value of maximal speed and climb time to 5000m.

 

Hmmm any chances for PZL P.24 in the future, Exec? It was built in relatively large numbers (for a Polish plane ) and served for quite a long time in several european airforces (Romanian, Greek, Bulgarian and in Turkey).
I can support all the data about this bird anytime.

 

not this version, stec
send the data to me in a month, pls (but obligatory )

 

Until some better info is posted here it is:

Fiat G55 Centauro and MC205V were very similar aircraft in every respect, here are some numbers:
G55 MC205V

weight (empty): 2630kg 2581kg
(max): 3718kg 3408kg

wing span: 11.85m 10.58m

wing area: 21.11sqm 16.8sqm

max speed(6000m): 630km/h 640km/h

climb to 6000m: 7min12sec n/a

ceiling: 12700m 16370m

I found no info on MC202 or 205 being able to carry any bombs, but G55 was able to carry 2x160kg bombs on wing racks.
Also, another source states that G55 was able to climb to 6000m in 5 minutes.

Maybe FH team should consider G55 instead of MC205V, if for no other reason than for the fact that there were aprox. 275 G55s and only 66 MC205Vs manufactured...

Also, why the hell not both versions of ME410? I vote for both of them!

 

Btw. what's with camouflage on planes added by FH?
Can it be better? If you can you should use Ki61 camouflage on MC202 but with different colours.

Also, if you want to add a plane of which only 66 were manufactured, then there is no reason why you shouldn't add F4U-4C!!!!!!!!
And why the hell do you want to add I-153? Against what is it going to be usable??? <img src="graemlins/nono.gif" border="0" alt="[No-no!]">
As someone said there are no A5Ms or Ki27s or CR32s and CR42s... So who is going to fly the damn thing???
<img src="graemlins/znaika.gif" border="0" alt="[Znaika]">

[ 07 January 2002: Message edited by: devill ]</p>