Off-Toipic forum.

Discussion in 'Warbirds International' started by illo, Jan 21, 2004.

  1. illo

    illo FH Beta Tester

    Joined:
    May 8, 2000
    Messages:
    4,168
    Location:
    Helsinki, Suomi (finland)
    I strongly believe that we should have an OT:Forum under the international forums, where it would be noticed and used by those interested.
    Main international forums would be for only FH related discussion so it would be more readable

    What do you think?
     
  2. Glas

    Glas Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2002
    Messages:
    3,928
    Location:
    Scotland
    I have to admit I like the way everything English speaking is bunched together in 1 forum. The 'International' forum is my sustenance through many long, dark days at work. Changing it would make it just one of the other many forums I visit when I should be doing other things ;)

    Im not against it though :)

    -glas-
     
  3. kangaa

    kangaa Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2002
    Messages:
    494
    Location:
    Townsville NQ Australia
    I must say i agree with Glas i like the way it works now....IMHO if it was just for FH stuff i would only come in once a month or so to get the FH news..
     
  4. Snakeye

    Snakeye Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2001
    Messages:
    3,232
    Location:
    EPWA
    THIS is OT forum ;)
    Most discussions here are already or will be OT anytime now :D
    And most threads start as OT from the beginning.
    So no point in making another forum or subforum - the "main" forum would be as alive as "news and announcements" :rolleyes:
     
  5. illo

    illo FH Beta Tester

    Joined:
    May 8, 2000
    Messages:
    4,168
    Location:
    Helsinki, Suomi (finland)
    I guess you're right.

    Probably i was hoping to see more ACM, tactics discussions and such.
    But realistically I don't think those would hop out of nowhere if OT subforum was there.

    Also in current way theres far less work for moderator.(no need to move threads from forum A to forum B and vice versa)
     
    Last edited: Jan 22, 2004
  6. RolandGarros

    RolandGarros Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2003
    Messages:
    2,867
    I think this is the appropriate place to suggest that on the B-24d, the option for 4 x 2000lbs bomb load be removed and in it's place an option for 3 x torpedoes & 3 x 500lbs bombs be made available, as this is how A/S B-24s were loaded IRL (IRL they were 3 x 500lbs depth charges)
     
  7. -cbfs-

    -cbfs- Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2003
    Messages:
    1,940
    Location:
    Where the flowers bloom like madness in the spri-i
    This option is great! I will now have the opportunity to kill a B-24 without having to climb to 10k and hope to still be able to see the damn plane :@popcorn:
     
  8. sebbo

    sebbo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2001
    Messages:
    2,415
    Location:
    Sector Plural-ZZ Alpha
    WOW CBFS! THAT'S THE SPIRIT!!!!!! :) :) :)

    And yeah, I agree..... On both topics! And with both parties on both topics! And on the other topics....

    geez, this is becoming complicated.