oil prices

Discussion in 'Warbirds International' started by --q---, Sep 14, 2005.

?

What fuel devider would you like?

  1. Higher! Give us more fuel!

    39.1%
  2. Lower! I prefer wooden planes and gliders.

    13.0%
  3. 0,4 is ok. I like fying with hole in my tank.

    13.0%
  4. traditional last item (added by exec)

    34.8%
  1. --q---

    --q--- Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2004
    Messages:
    332
    Location:
    Pruszcz Gdanski - Poland
    I know that the oil prices go up, but Russia is exporting this stuff so it actualy becemes stinking rich nowdays. Yet they dont wont do give us any, fuel devider down to 0,4. Preaty preaty please with sugar on the top Admins, give us more fuel. I now U are not lowlives who would lower the fuel devider just to make most cons fly low when la5fn goes out. Such a noble people wouldnt do that and the 0,4 fueldevider is just a mistake.
     
  2. Broz

    Broz Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2002
    Messages:
    8,830
    Location:
    Salamanca (España)
    it's an advantage for turn & boom planes. Will be finally lighter and useful. I'm eager to try p39Q now :turret:

    :)
     
  3. --q---

    --q--- Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2004
    Messages:
    332
    Location:
    Pruszcz Gdanski - Poland
    Broz I love U so much ! :dark:
     
  4. Broz

    Broz Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2002
    Messages:
    8,830
    Location:
    Salamanca (España)
    Another one to the list :rolleyes: ;)

    No, seriously, i know you won't have time to climb to 7 km, watch over a field and vulch for an hour, but we, those who don't like B&Z but an adrenaline boost from a good T&B, will be happier.
     
  5. Broz

    Broz Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2002
    Messages:
    8,830
    Location:
    Salamanca (España)
    btw, i'm eager for the last option too, added by exec:

    [​IMG]

    Nothing personal, --q---, really
     
  6. --q---

    --q--- Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2004
    Messages:
    332
    Location:
    Pruszcz Gdanski - Poland
    Play quake man !

    btw people is plural noun.
     
  7. Broz

    Broz Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2002
    Messages:
    8,830
    Location:
    Salamanca (España)
    Why? T&B isn't part of the game? What is wrong with it? Go play chess if you like tactics that much and a boring game. I don't like spending 1,5 hours playing to spot one con, and not kill him because i'll loose my precious alt. So why should i leave the game? Because i disagree with you? Damn luftwhiner...

    You say this because of my signature? People are changing and people is changing are both corrects. So what do you want to show me?

    btw, want correction? ok, in your first post here, write becomes instead becemes, or pretty instead preaty or divider instead devider.
     
  8. Snakeye

    Snakeye Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2001
    Messages:
    3,232
    Location:
    EPWA
    Broz, you left out a few more mistakes ;)
     
  9. Red Ant

    Red Ant Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2002
    Messages:
    4,946
    Location:
    Germany
    Not to be a grammar Nazi or even stick my dirty nose in stuff I have no business with (God knows I'd never do that :p) but IMO 'people is changing' is not correct in this context.
     
  10. Red Ant

    Red Ant Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2002
    Messages:
    4,946
    Location:
    Germany
    Oh and yes, please give us our old fueldiv back! :p
     
  11. Broz

    Broz Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2002
    Messages:
    8,830
    Location:
    Salamanca (España)
    whatever, i'll let it as is :)
     
  12. Fucketeer

    Fucketeer Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2005
    Messages:
    3,280
    Da people is changing like yo momma's mood when ya lickin 'er fluffy tail.
     
  13. Broz

    Broz Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2002
    Messages:
    8,830
    Location:
    Salamanca (España)
    Ok, i changed it. So don't touch my balls no more, you wankers! :)
     
  14. big-jo

    big-jo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2002
    Messages:
    3,634
    Location:
    Spain
    PLS FUEL DIV. 1.0!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


    i can resist there is not p47D1-24, i can resist p47d30 is availabnle at june 44, i can resist there is no p47N and yes p39d34534656 or il2 with torpedo or other thing, BUT I CANN T RESIST TO FLY 15 MIN CLIMBING ONLY TO 6 KM AND MY FUEL IS GONE TO 50%!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! AND OVER MY OWN BASE!!!! WTF
     
  15. spuint

    spuint Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2003
    Messages:
    4,736
    higher fueldiv doesnt exclude tnb - there are at least few ways to lighten ur plane
    lower fueldiv does exclude bnz

    arena full of tnb only is much more boring than arena with players who fly both ways

    live and let live
     
  16. spuint

    spuint Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2003
    Messages:
    4,736
    and btw

    changing such vital setting at arena - during the tod - in half of its previous value is nonsense..
     
  17. Broz

    Broz Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2002
    Messages:
    8,830
    Location:
    Salamanca (España)
    1. which ways?
    2. Full of both is of course much funnier, but fuel div lower doesn't mean you can't do B&Z. Bitch-jo says he wastes 50% of fuel, but, damn, he's 6km high. Imho is enough, specially when others won't climb to that alt becasue they suffer fuel div too. If it should only affect one type of plane, i'd understand the whine, but it affects all in the same way. So we will see B&Zers, only that they'll keep vulching for less time than before. That's the only change i see. And this arena doesn't need lots of fuel to move across :)
    3. Exactly! I can live with heavier planes, but i will live with lighter ones much more happy. And it wasn't me who proposed him to leave in the first place ;)


    Anyway, i like this change.
     
  18. big-jo

    big-jo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2002
    Messages:
    3,634
    Location:
    Spain
    broz, i climb 6 km because i fly p47 (sorry if i say it too much), and the normal ceilling was 7-9 km...do you think is fair to fly a jug at low alt against quakers?

    when i fly at 6 km i ignore low cons, i only attack cons over 2-3 km alt. i know what there will be T&B ers always, but fuck, let to other to find their own enjoyment, i like to fly high, and im sure that many others too


    my point is, fuel div 1.0 and not restriction of fuel, fun for all
     
  19. Broz

    Broz Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2002
    Messages:
    8,830
    Location:
    Salamanca (España)
    cc, big, but with higher fuel div and 100% fuel rule, p39Q light is simply useless for 20 mins (until you burn some fuel). So trying for some time to have a lower fuel div will help those of us that don't like to reach the Sputnik before entering a fight. And it doesn't mean we're quakers or any other shit. Is just that we like another style.

    However, agree in that we should have fuel div 1.0 and no 100% rule. That would be great
     
  20. Perdomo

    Perdomo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2002
    Messages:
    1,783
    Location:
    Spain
    Agree. Fueldiv 1 so fuel lasts, and no 100% fuel rule so TnB can choose less to have lighter planes.











    What am I saying? I don't fly since 2 years.....