he must be confused. F-15 is undefeated in air to air combat he must mean the jet powered one so who cares, one is not many. MiG-25 is too slow to be of any real use
The "firepower" hummm..... rapid firing small arms fire has to hit vunerable spots and many times to get a KILL. I have HUNDREDS of ASSIST kills with the 153. and I'm ok with that as most of the times they ran away and my friends would chase after the smokers and finish them off. So yes, I agree that the guns shoot rather rapidly, but the "take-down power is just not there. CRAPOLLA AND BULLSHIT DEPT: Puting 337 rounds into a Ju52 or Ju88 and I get hit with ONE 7.92mm. I get killed and the other plane with fuel leaks and smoke flies off and lands. This one hit was into the plane and not into the 'pilot", unless there is no message that pilot has been shot.... Yeah, the zeke has LOTS of fuel and when hit with all those little 153 rounds most of the time there are lots of little fuel leaks, even then zekes never catch fire and keep on flying and flying and flying....two wings, one wing, no wings..... And remember: To fight a 153 is TOTALLY and elective decision. ALL planes can out run a 153. Maybe a Ju52 cannot, can't remember. So I will correct my statement: MOST planes can out run the 153. That's why I say it is mostly a defensive plane. Other than the use for ground attack, but even then mostly in reaction to the invading acks and tanks. A field with good ack cover one has to be VERY VERY VERY good with roc and agility and I am not. I'm lucky to get two acks killed before I get blasted into a flaming ball of scrap lumber. Also 153 with rocs or bombs does not turm like the clean version. I hope that after releasing rocs the plane acts different. Hope the admins didn't miss that one...ha ha ha....
Nice pics. That first one reminds me of the P-61 night fighter/ black widow. That would be a nice one to fly here at the Pacific Theater. Fast- lots of guns and great turning.....
interesting huh? just like this "f-5 freedom fighter" remind me of p-38: ...in ur dreams or do u hav ur own "special source" for that info too?
Oh EXCUSE ME, Madame gandhi, your anal retentiveness; I forgot that one must be so correct and you need to have everything explained to you, you special person, you. How is this: "Relative to other twin engined heavy fighters of the time." By the way you did go to read the books that told you the truth about the P-63 ? 58 rounds of 37mm HE and supercharged engine, about 3,000 delivered to Russia? Seems you and your brother bhoover love that plane....
And if I change those plane names f.e. B-25, TBF, Li-2 neither would I be lieing. DM is very random, I know ( I think it has something to do with speed) (or then it is an evil communistic plot to ruin polish cheaters day ) And I still haven't seen such "tank" zeke or been able to fly such. Most of the time people get me killed with few shots (spits normally need one hit to kill any jap. It's the rear fuselage thingie...) But con with no wings and flying is connex matter. I saw once Il-4 extending from me without wings. Maybe it died when plingtest came through....
"..... DM is very random, I know ( I think it has something to do with speed) ......." Yes, so do I ...those admins should stop taking drugs.
Does your nurse know what you do with the computer time you are allowed? Maybe they should change your medication.
Oh Yeah. I see you and gandhi are such fine examples here at the forum and at the game...... ha ha ha....
now seriously strafe, ottos of 410 were crap in real life, gunner couldn t to aim properly those turrets.....
Hi big-jo, no doubt that 410 ottos were hard to manage. But pls do a test. 1st:Go 410 and choose light version. Check ottos angles. 2nd:Go again but this time choose 8x50kg bombload and check again ottos angle. Ops... a bug found The second one shows the correct angles that ottos had (just like my sources shown). I'm asking just to fix them like they used to be (like in ammoload with 8x50). Accuracity is another topic....
