Correct the flight models of....... suggestions

OK everyone;

Can anyone of you out there in FH land post a word or two on suggested corrections for the flight model of planes here and now on FH?


From these suggestions I would like to form a poll.

Thanks

 

eh... well proven suggested corrections will be implemented without any polls.
however, many people have real problems proving fixe requests.

 

Gandhi has made a quite elucidative test some time ago proving that spit's absurd E retention is a FACT.

 

he also did some test proving that one wing flying is possible

 

Well, I landed several times with only 1 wing...
Zeke is is particularly good in such thing.

 

I see...and I suppose you have some historical data to prove this?

 

If you have suggestions with or without historical data, perferably with, please share it with us. I am not interested in third person statements, nor opinions.

Thank you

 

Perhaps you can let us know what you will consider as proof.

 

http://www.uss-bennington.org/phz-nowing-f15.html
Ok, a Zeke isn't a F-15, but it proves that it's not physically impossible...

 

wow

looseleaf doesnt want to know ur ideas

he is just pickin trying to pick a fight

looseleaf will keep troll this thread 'til some1 says waht he want to hear

so hier it is:

-p39 should carry 58x37mm rounds
-p51 shood outclimb 109
-190 should be tune down because original fh developery said 190 is "dweeb plane"

happy now bhoover?

go make ur "poll" now and stop trolling

 

LMFAO gandhi, you've got all figured out,WTG!

 

fix my favrit planez!!!1
mayks it fostr & trun more with big gunns!!!and boms+rokits 2

 

Correct spitfire 9c turn time. It is 17 s should be 18,5 s. Heres a log

 

i repeat:

note: kotfc, wrg and other games are not reliable sources.

 

make sure you have accurate w/x data from time & place of report also, it effects performance considerably

 

the plane Spitfire mk 9c has FH parameter turn time measured as 17 seconds while 100% fuel at alt 1000m with WEP. in real life the plane Spitfire mk 9c with merlin 61 engine giving Take-Off Power 1,280 hp (12 lb) (955 kW) 1,565 hp (MS gear) (1,167 kW) 1,390 hp (FS gear) (1,037 kW) (data from http://www.spitfireart.com/merlin_engines.html) had the same parameter value 18,5 (data from NII VVS Report TSAGI №256) loaded with 100% fuel ( i dont know the exact capacity of fuel) at the same alt. please fix FH airplane Spitfire mk 9c to have this parameter 18,5s instead of unrealistic 17s.

 

forwarded to bw

 

Why are we using RUSSIAN data for an aircraft of BRITISH origin??? Hang on... I've got it!!! Data from the US/British and Allies isn't trusted in here. If it ain't German or Russian, don't bother

Just a side note... When are we gonna get back the Spitfire IX with the 'E' wing and its 2 x .50 cal MGs??? This was one of the original aircraft in iEN WB. It'll sure help having a bit more firepower when going up against the uber golds.

 

Last TOD I was in spitfire it puzzled me the speed of the Ki-44 vs Spit IX. Spit has more powerful engine (apropos, wich?) more streamlined fuselage, the famous elliptical wing, yet it is slower, in my experience to the Ki on the deck. Ki has lighter airframe and smaller wing OTOH. Does it make up for it? Last time I found a Ki-44 + Ki-43 on my tail I felt like Saddam on Christmas Day.

On the other hand, a slower, worse turning, worse armed Ki wouldn't be very popular, would it? This raises in my head the question: Are performance of FH planes adjusted for better gameplay (more even matchups)? I remember long ago it was stated Il-2 is somewhat porked on purpose in turning ability, other planes as well?

As FH speed charts are very out of date I like to check AH ones. (Also here) Some comparisons between planes in AH and FH bring different results. For example La-7 is faster than Tempest here, 190A turns as well or better than Typhoon here, F4U4 faster than Dora OTD here, etc... (All this IIRC and in fact I just remember prolly because I was in the losing side in a particular combat, so I'm not a very realiable source). I wish AH and FH performances were closer or that I understand why they differ. Probably that means I have to read more so...

did I mention this girl and this too host programs on spanish TV?

 

@bazura: patricia conde me pone como un toro, y no es porque sea rubia, porque a mi no me gustan, pero es que es tan simpatica....ademas de guapa claro. En cuanto a la otra pssss prefiero a la que hace jefa, supongo que es lo que llaman erotica del poder jajajajja