Planes that I hope to fly someday in FH...

Discussion in 'Warbirds International' started by joseh-, Sep 24, 2009.

  1. Asmumy

    Asmumy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2006
    Messages:
    427
    Location:
    São Paulo, Brasil
    As you can see on my avatar, when in island, i chose the 2nd, wich has the interesting part.

    Now, back to the thread, i'de like to fly the HE-111 wich was modelled years ago and it's ready to be on FHL list. I remember to see a thread about it, with pictures of model and cockpit.
     
  2. joseh-

    joseh- Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2008
    Messages:
    250
    Don't remember that, but if He-111 come to the game, it would be a great addiction!!!!
    Also Do-217M would be great, either early buff Do-17Z, like WB2009 does!
     
  3. Red Ant

    Red Ant Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2002
    Messages:
    4,946
    Location:
    Germany
    Haha, now there's a sexist statement if ever I read one. :D
     
  4. airfax

    airfax Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2001
    Messages:
    3,222
    Location:
    Tampere,Finland
    why? 111 is worse than Ju-88. AFAIR Ju-88S was put in the game instead, so golds would have a fast bomber...
     
  5. -al---

    -al--- Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2005
    Messages:
    6,848
    Location:
    Poznań
    Better just make those late ju-88's available from small fields, like it used to be.

    I don't EVER recall anyone complaining about it, yet it got changed. Ain't that familiar.
     
  6. demian

    demian Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2006
    Messages:
    917
    Why not? Its about variety not about quality.
    With so many great b25s, why not he-111?
    More planes=better game.
     
  7. airfax

    airfax Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2001
    Messages:
    3,222
    Location:
    Tampere,Finland
    Because you'd be whining about it in a week.
    "Why so poor payload", "it climbs like shit" and "damn, it's slow"....

    Since the slots limit the amount of planes, one should focus on quality.
     
  8. -al---

    -al--- Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2005
    Messages:
    6,848
    Location:
    Poznań
  9. -exec-

    -exec- FH Consultant

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2000
    Messages:
    24,690
    Location:
    xUSSR
    no, it is not ready.
    nor 10 pictures for cockpit, neither wb-gfx model with 6 graphic levels of detalisation within.
    it was "1 view forward" and "3 LODs in Lightwave format".
     
  10. joseh-

    joseh- Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2008
    Messages:
    250
    @-exec-
    The models must be made only in Lightwave 3D?
    WB supports planes made on 3DS Max?
    What is wb-gfx model?
    And 6 graphic levels of detalisation?
    May you put a link or tutorial with explanation on WB-made planes? (like the ones we have here).

    And 111 is great plane!
    Mb an Ar-234B could solve some problems... :cool:
     
    Last edited: Sep 28, 2009
  11. demian

    demian Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2006
    Messages:
    917
    Ju-87 is slow, bad climb.
    Ju-88 is slow , bad climb.
    TBF is slow, bad climb.
    SBD is slow, bad climb.
    B-24 , bad climb.
    I mean, what is enough for you? Where do u find criteria what is fast , what is slow, what is good for game? We want variety so we can go fast and slow, climbing and diving, running and dying. Not all buffs should be like he-177 and pe-8 you know?
     
  12. -al---

    -al--- Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2005
    Messages:
    6,848
    Location:
    Poznań
    well, Ju-88S is a formula one racing car amongst buffs
     
  13. airfax

    airfax Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2001
    Messages:
    3,222
    Location:
    Tampere,Finland
    He 111 is slower, worse payload, and less armed.

    He111 didn't get there because the 3d model faced some problems. (Could be implemented AFAIR) So devs decided to use all ready existing model of 88, and make a lighter, faster bomber for gold. This because not all golds want to go low, slow and mostly die. And that's what you'd have with 111....

    Where do I find criteria? It was in a thread few years ago. use search and step down from your high horse...

    @joseh: What exactly made 111 " a great plane"? From your POW?
     
  14. joseh-

    joseh- Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2008
    Messages:
    250
    Well....
    Do you play WB2009 at TH?
    I personally prefer He-111H-3 instead of Ju-88A-4.
    I fly and close a small field even with 4x500kg (Blast Effects), and wingmen.
    It climbs much better than Ju-88A-4, but it's a little bit slower.
    I think the problem is between the chair and the joy/keyboard/mouse/etc...
    :D :D :D :D


    @-exec-
    The models must be made only in Lightwave 3D?
    WB supports planes made on 3DS Max?
    What is wb-gfx model?
    And 6 graphic levels of detalisation?
    May you put a link or tutorial with explanation on WB-made planes? (like the ones we have here).
     
  15. airfax

    airfax Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2001
    Messages:
    3,222
    Location:
    Tampere,Finland
    Yes, it must be me then. My wingmans don't do their job, blast effect sucks and I can't close small field with 4x500.

    Then again I'm talking about 2.77 and you're talking about 2009.

    "How to make" and the thread about He111 can be found from archives...

    And the "how to" could be founded even from exec's permanent links...
    http://forum.wbfree.net/forums/showpost.php?p=597155&postcount=16
    (exec might update the info any day now.... :D )
     
    Last edited: Sep 28, 2009
  16. joseh-

    joseh- Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2008
    Messages:
    250
    Ops!
    The WB2009 was an example of how He-111 works.
    I should have learned that I can't compare 2009 with 2.77 (who read my post about Macchis know...)
    But, btw, 2.77 don't have He-111 for me to see how it works.
    And I think it will never happen, with people disgusting it even without flying it.
    Sry airfax, ty for the info!! :eek: :eek:
     
  17. Asmumy

    Asmumy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2006
    Messages:
    427
    Location:
    São Paulo, Brasil
    OK OK OK! Stop It!!

    BF-109, FW-190, Spit and P-51 are enough for WarBirds and Free Host! :D
     
  18. -exec-

    -exec- FH Consultant

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2000
    Messages:
    24,690
    Location:
    xUSSR
    http://wio.ru/aviasim/wb3d-mod.htm
    we expected "some of our folks" to program a converter from lightwave to warbirds, but he failed.

    however, cockpit instructions are in full effect.

    he 111 is inferior to ju 88, isn't it? in all steps: h-3 is worse than a-1, h-6/16 is worse than a-4.
     
  19. airfax

    airfax Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2001
    Messages:
    3,222
    Location:
    Tampere,Finland
    NAh, it's just that to get He111 you need to have a proggie (which doesn't exist, yet anyway), reason for it ("me like" might be good enough, I don't know) and few open plane slots (like four f.e. for different payloads)...

    What planes would you ditch and why? (AFAIR all the slots are in use at this moment...)
     
  20. demian

    demian Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2006
    Messages:
    917
    Did u read thread title? Or just trying to be wise ass?:dunno:
    Thread says : "H O P E to fly somedays.."
    That means, he is not OBLIGATED to report to u anything.
    We really need "a proggie"?
    "ME like" not enough for you?
    Ok, so who u are? An admin? Develloper? Wise ass?
    Why would anyone here report to YOU, what slots we dont need , what plane we want etc?
    I think i saw Exec in this thread, so if u wouldnt mind u could as well step out.
    Or if u want to participate, put some planes u would like to fly , or whatever, just dont tell me we need SERVER to play fh , then i will really think ur retarded.