About a Squirell: He's so anti-European and pro facist-american, cause he has never been outside his Boeing-owned Washington pothole... he sure knows a lot about planes, but - living with his parents he knows a fuck about living on your own, still he pretends to be the Oracle in all the subjects concering America. You know Shit Squirl. Even if you try to convince any1 here you'll be as laughworthy as a human being can ever be. My main advantage over You is that I've been to the "States" while you've never been to Europe. I know your "redneck-power-rampage" style of thinking about yourselves you little, uneducated, stupid (as you've already mentiond intelligence can go without education- go have a read at David Goleman's shitwork- he has a lot to say about that) and world-ruling privilege. You're a part of an industrialized society, while I, and the other western- and middle-Europeans here are the product of a post-industrial era. The "Age of Aquarius" as you may (deliberately) call us. We're pro-dialogue, while you're pro-confrontation. So there's not really no point in prooving that you're wrong... you're just a caveman, seeking it's way towards civilizing... we hope you'll find it sometime No offence- but that's the way I'll treat you after you've posted that pictures
@RedAnt Read some Sociological disputes... I'll need no more to carry on on that anymore after that Or just Google for "Industial Age" and "Postindustrial Age" instead.... sorry, but I do feel (and that strongly) like a member of a post-industrial society... I'm just like that, and you won't help that (at least I hope so)
Sad to say Cheap, fast and wrong QUITE OFTEN beats Expensive and good. one of many examples are biles's shoes.
Same here. There's 300000 unemployed people in Finland and more gets fired every day. And yet we are told that we're going to have a shortage of workers. Industry here will (probably) either bring the cheaper labour in the country or move the factories Indonesia/Pakistan whatever....
Oh, I think I know what the words "industrial" and "post-industrial" entail. I'm just a bit baffled why you would think that the US is still in the industrial stage.
the more negrohs and messicans in da southirn states --> low eye-kyoo da libral state of masschoosets, new jrsey, vermont, delewear, new hamster, main, road island, pensilvainia, conneticunt, marrieland, new yourk, washingtun, minesota, and michigun are all whitey-land das ist why dhey have da higher eye-kyoo
Who da man up there who say higher IQ because less blacks? I thinkin, niggers been hunted and exploited for so long, them ape-men is HIGHLY intelligent. See? It is darwin shit, see? Now, just because a nigger has a very good set of darwinian genes and the possibility of good brains, doesn't excuse him from joinin the rest of the human race and NOT actin like a fuckin animal... Just look at that 50 Cent guy. Multi-millionaire. And that guy is even looked UP to by stupid white boys. Now, 50 Cent is smart as a fuckin whip. See? Now, go to his official web site and what is the first thing you see? Evidence that man is a fuckin brute, a savage, a low-life. You can be very intellignet and still a low down drug dealin gang belonging In Need Of The Lash or The Rope Bush Nigger. I understand the Nigger States brought Mr Carter in. I don't believe he was such a bad dude. So maybe them Nigger States can do good stuff too, as long as the Bad Niggers go to California and stay there....
Do you even know what the original meaning of 'civilization' was? Civilization, in the original sense of the word, was 'city life.' Ancient humans originally settled in permanent communities because they needed a place where they could grow crops and live safe from the barbarians who roamed the countryside. The human race, through its ingenuity and inventiveness, has solved these problems. A person can now settle in one location and grow crops without the threat of nomadic tribes. In a sense, humanity no longer needs civilization; civilization was conceived as the solution to humanity's main problems - problems which have long since disappeared. If the founding purpose behind civilization's invention has been resolved, why, then, has civilization continued to grow? As it turns out, civilization has informed humans of goods and services they did not know they needed. It is one of the great bait-and-switches in history. Humans set out to find the solution to their nomad lifestyle and barbarian problems, but they found out that they needed government, trading, art, writing, organized spiritualism and all the other facets of city life. These goods and services have expanded along with the urbanization of the human race. Efficiency has been sacrificed in the name of quality of life. As time goes on, more raw materials are diverted into disciplines which are not necessary for the survival of the city: social medicine, pension plans, public transportation, etc. These services may improve the quality of life, but they are neither efficient nor sustainable. So tell me frog, do you want to live in a civilization which increasingly informs itself of services it does not need? Are you proud of development away from the original intent of civilization? There is nothing wrong with city life, but an overabundance of civilization corrupts and spoils its citizens. Civilization does not teach individuals to be independent. Civilization perpetuates itself by making its citizens dependents of society. Urbanization continues only because civilization creates problems for which civilization is the only answer. Cities continuously fail to render themselves obsolete. Why would anybody want to be a part of that kind of 'development?'
Can't have high population without civilization. The goal of life is to perpetuate and grow. Many things are not done with forethought. We ain't a lot different than wasps [read about the life cycle of paper wasps. It is depressin]
A city's original purpose was to provide protection and a permanent place to grow crops. Unfortunately, civilization's complexity has multiplied to the extent of what it is in Europe. The situation is much like a person's purchase of a car. A man goes to a car dealership and looks for a car which will simply get him from point A to point B. Before he knows it, he succumbs to his desires and pays for a DVD player, heated leather seats, cupholders, headlight wipers, electrically adjustable seating, dual-sunroofs, a trailer package, surround sound, GPS hardware and an anti-theft system. This 'fully loaded' car is much like socialist civilizations. A 'socialist' car has dozens of services which a passenger is perfectly capable of providing for himself. Features such as DVD players, heated leather seats, cupholders, headlight wipers, electrically adjustable seating, dual-sunroofs, trailer packages, surround sound stereos, GPS hardware and anti-theft systems are all examples of how the car accomodates the passengers in such a way. The United States, on the other hand, is more like a basic 'no frills' car. It does not have features which provide entertainment, comfort and convenience for its 'passengers.' The passenger is responsible for his own entertainment, comfort and convenience. The car provides only the essentials; the passenger covers the rest. As a result of its simplicity and 'no frills' nature, the American-style car will almost certainly get better mileage (higher productivity) and will leave more money in the pockets of the consumer (fiscal conservatism). It is ironic that Europeans scoff at gas-guzzling, oversized American SUVs while they are themselves residents of an oversized government which wastes resources. Think about it: the reason why SUVs waste gasoline is the same reason why socialist bureaucracy wastes so many resources. Both are oversized and weighed down by the dead weight of additional 'features.'
Be that as it may be that: The USA may skimp on non-nessesities, but you fail to define what is and what is not a nessesity.... A 100,000 tonne aircraft carrier to some would be a WASTE of resources and not an options free, vanilla package. When the aircraft carrier puts to sea it has a couple MacDonald's Restaraunts on board, a Wendy's Burger joint, a cineplex Odion theater Coca Cola machines all over the fuckin place, gaming arcades, dance hall, a chapel for each of the MAJOR religions [Jew, prtestant and catholic], tattoo parlour, music store, three radio stations NOT on the armed forces radio network, three television stations and a shitload more I am getting too fuckin pissed off to mention, I am getting old and my patience is actually LOWER than it used to be - with some people. Some countries might very well consider building an aircraft carrier that sails like a warship, not a shopping mall. Is it true the B1b Strategic Bomber has a fuckin COFFEE machine on-board? Why couldn't the crew just bring a thermos each? I mean, sure, a comode might be a nessesity on a long flight, but a coffee machine built to MILITARY SPEC [which means 'name a price of a coffee maker and multiply that figure by 1000]... Where is the collective wealth of the prosperous people? Collected into a few pockets perhaps? [ad homine deleted] I would rather have my system. Yes, I am not a rich man. Of course I would rather have socialism.
It is 5am and yet this got me a good laugh! BRA-VO! Ancient humans? You mean Neanderthals??? Trying to save their asses from the evil Homo Barbariensis??? AHHAAHHAHAHAH-FUCKIN-UAHAUAUHAAUAHHAU!!! Yes, I can imagine Neanderthals being chased by a huge Nordic guy with a wild beard and a huge axe. Quite the spectacle, don't you agree?
